Literature DB >> 11115283

Accuracy of computer navigation in ear, nose, throat surgery: the influence of matching strategy.

J Claes1, E Koekelkoren, F L Wuyts, G M Claes, L Van den Hauwe, P H Van de Heyning.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of 4 different matching strategies on the accuracy of computer navigation on the face and within the nose and rhinopharynx.
DESIGN: Survey.
SETTING: Laboratory study.
SUBJECTS: Six human cadavers studied within 24 hours of death.
INTERVENTIONS: A commercially available navigation system with infrared optical tracking was used for computer navigation on the face and within the nose of the subjects after matching with external fiducials or with 3 different configurations of anatomical landmarks. Navigation errors were measured and correlated to matching strategies and compared through statistical analysis.
RESULTS: Matching with external fiducials on the face results in smaller navigation error than matching with anatomical landmarks. The configuration of matching strategies with anatomical landmarks also significantly determines the accuracy of computer navigation, especially when different locations of accuracy measurement are considered.
CONCLUSION: Statistically significant findings have shown that the choice of a matching strategy is a major factor in the accuracy of computer navigation for ear, nose, throat surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126:1462-1466

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11115283     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.126.12.1462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  7 in total

1.  [Accuracy and precision in the evaluation of computer assisted surgical systems. A definition].

Authors:  G Strauss; M Hofer; W Korb; C Trantakis; D Winkler; O Burgert; T Schulz; A Dietz; J Meixensberger; K Koulechov
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [Clinical efficiency and the influence of human factors on ear, nose, and throat navigation systems].

Authors:  G Strauss; K Koulechov; S Röttger; J Bahner; C Trantakis; M Hofer; W Korb; O Burgert; J Meixensberger; D Manzey; A Dietz; T Lüth
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  An effective point-based registration tool for surgical navigation.

Authors:  Jaesung Hong; Makoto Hashizume
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Prospects and limitations of different registration modalities in electromagnetic ENT navigation.

Authors:  Eric Soteriou; Juergen Grauvogel; Roland Laszig; Tanja Daniela Grauvogel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Development of a surgical navigation system based on 3D Slicer for intraoperative implant placement surgery.

Authors:  Xiaojun Chen; Lu Xu; Huixiang Wang; Fang Wang; Qiugen Wang; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  [Markerless patient registration. A new technique for image-guided surgery of the lateral base of the skull].

Authors:  R Marmulla; J Mühling; G Eggers; S Hassfeld
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Navigation accuracy after automatic- and hybrid-surface registration in sinus and skull base surgery.

Authors:  Tanja Daniela Grauvogel; Paul Engelskirchen; Wiebke Semper-Hogg; Juergen Grauvogel; Roland Laszig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.