Literature DB >> 11115141

Mothers' explanatory models of lack of child growth.

E Reifsnider1, J Allan, M Percy.   

Abstract

This qualitative study elicited the explanatory models (EMs) of child growth held by mothers of growth-deficient children. EMs are culturally constructed explanations for a specific illness and its treatment (Kleinman, 1980). The EM concept was adapted for this study to focus on a child health condition instead of an illness. The sample comprised 22 mothers of growth deficient children who were interviewed 2 years after the conclusion of an intervention study to promote child growth. Growth deficiency was defined as below the 10th percentile for weight, height, or weight for height on the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) growth grids (Hamill, Drzid, Johnson, Reed, & Roche, 1976). Three major domains were identified in the EMs of growth held by mothers: (1) illness or heredity (etiology); (2) keeping track of growth (course); and (3) helping my child grow (treatment). The mothers in this study were concerned about their children's size and growth patterns and they monitored their children's growth with the methods available to them. They identified illnesses and allergies as environmental factors that negatively impact their children's growth. All mothers viewed size as a function of heredity. The findings from this study suggest that an emphasis on size will not encourage mothers to focus on their children's growth. The EMs for growth and size were different. Health care providers may be more effective in enhancing children's growth by teaching parents how to deal with the day-to-day problems of children who are picky eaters, stretching limited food money, creating mealtime schedules, and dealing with illnesses before they become severe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11115141     DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2000.00434.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nurs        ISSN: 0737-1209            Impact factor:   1.462


  6 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of lay views about infant size and growth.

Authors:  P Lucas; L Arai; J Baird; J Kleijnen; C Law; H Roberts
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 2.  What is normal, healthy growth? Global health, human biology, and parental perspectives.

Authors:  Amanda L Thompson
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Worked examples of alternative methods for the synthesis of qualitative and quantitative research in systematic reviews.

Authors:  Patricia J Lucas; Janis Baird; Lisa Arai; Catherine Law; Helen M Roberts
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  "A child may be tall but stunted." Meanings attached to childhood height in Tanzania.

Authors:  Zaina Mchome; Ajay Bailey; Shrinivas Darak; Hinke Haisma
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Nutrition disparities and the global burden of malnutrition.

Authors:  Rafael Perez-Escamilla; Odilia Bermudez; Gabriela Santos Buccini; Shiriki Kumanyika; Chessa K Lutter; Pablo Monsivais; Cesar Victora
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-06-13

6.  'He usually has what we call normal fevers': Cultural perspectives on healthy child growth in rural Southeastern Tanzania: An ethnographic enquiry.

Authors:  Zaina Mchome; Ajay Bailey; Shrinivas Darak; Flora Kessy; Hinke Haisma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.