Literature DB >> 11114154

Effects of air flow on rat electroolfactogram.

P E Scott-Johnson1, D Blakley, J W Scott.   

Abstract

The electroolfactogram (EOG) previously has been used to demonstrate the regional distribution of rat olfactory epithelial odorant responses. Here, we evaluated the effects of airflow parameters on EOGs in two preparations: one where odorants were directly applied to the epithelium (opened preparation) and one where odorants were drawn through the nasal passages by an artificial sniff (closed preparation). EOG rise times served as one measure of odorant access. For isoamyl acetate (but not for limonene), rise times were slower in the lateral recesses of the closed (but not the opened) preparation. Polar odorants (amyl acetate, carvone and benzaldehyde) evoked smaller responses in the closed preparation than in the opened preparation, and these responses were particularly depressed in the lateral regions of the closed preparation. Responses to nonpolar hydrocarbon odorants (limonene and benzene) were equal in the lateral regions of both preparations, but were somewhat depressed in the medial region of the closed preparation. The responses to some polar odorants in the closed preparation were sensitive to changes in airflow parameters. These data suggest that the sorptive properties of the nose contribute substantially to determining the response of the epithelium and act to increase differences produced by inherent receptor mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11114154     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/25.6.761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  18 in total

Review 1.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Effects of concentration and sniff flow rate on the rat electroolfactogram.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium to retronasal air flow.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill; Maggie Phan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Chemotopic odorant coding in a mammalian olfactory system.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

5.  A method for generating natural and user-defined sniffing patterns in anesthetized or reduced preparations.

Authors:  Man Ching Cheung; Ryan M Carey; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 6.  All in a sniff: olfaction as a model for active sensing.

Authors:  Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Continuous neural plasticity in the olfactory intrabulbar circuitry.

Authors:  Diana M Cummings; Leonardo Belluscio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Long hydrocarbon chains serve as unique molecular features recognized by ventral glomeruli of the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Sabrina L Ho; Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Temporal structure of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb imaged in behaving rats.

Authors:  Ryan M Carey; Justus V Verhagen; Daniel W Wesson; Nicolás Pírez; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Testing the sorption hypothesis in olfaction: a limited role for sniff strength in shaping primary odor representations during behavior.

Authors:  Tristan Cenier; John P McGann; Yusuke Tsuno; Justus V Verhagen; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.