Literature DB >> 1111402

The N2 closing volume test in population studies: sources of variation and reproducibility.

M R Becklake, M Leclerc, H Strobach, J Swift.   

Abstract

Sources of variation in the nitrogen closing volume test and derived measurements were examined in the results of 13 subjects, each of whom performed 3 sequential trials on 2 occasions 30 to 60 minutes apart, on 2 separate days 1 week apart (156 trials in all). Results were examined to evaluate the relative sensitivity of the various measurements for differences between sujbects and, by implication, their potential value in population studies. Using the ratio of signal (between-subject variance) to noise (within-subject variance) as the criterion, the sensitivities of the ratio of closing volume to vital capacity (CV/VC,%) and the ratio of closing capacity to total lung capacity (CC/TLC,%) were comparable; contrary to expectation, sensitivity decreased rather than increased with side-by-side compared to independent tracing analysis. Comparison of various test schedules showed the greatest sensitivity when the mean of 3 measurements was used, with a single measurement of CV/VC,% being only one-third as sensitive, and a single measurement of CC/TLC,% being one-half as sensitive as the mean. In addition, the validity of the measurements of total lung capacity from nitrogen dilution in a single oxygen breath was confirmed by the demonstration of good agreement with helium dilution values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1111402     DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1975.111.2.141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  9 in total

1.  Intrasubject variability of maximal expiratory flow volume curve.

Authors:  G M Cochrane; F Prieto; T J Clark
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Automatisation of the single-breath nitrogen washout test.

Authors:  M F Melo; A Giannella Neto
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Ventilation.

Authors:  G M Sterling
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Reproducibility of pulmonary function tests under laboratory and field conditions.

Authors:  R G Love; M D Attfield; K D Isles
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1980-02

5.  Intrasubject variability of pulmonary function testing in healthy children.

Authors:  A A Hutchison; A Erben; L A McLennan; L I Landau; P D Phelan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 9.139

6.  Lung volumes.

Authors:  S Freedman
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-08       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Lung function, maximum and submaximum exercise testing in COPD patients: reproducibility over a long interval.

Authors:  A Noseda; J P Carpiaux; T Prigogine; J Schmerber
Journal:  Lung       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 8.  Techniques of assessing small airways dysfunction.

Authors:  William McNulty; Omar S Usmani
Journal:  Eur Clin Respir J       Date:  2014-10-17

Review 9.  An overview of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Can tests of small airways' function guide diagnosis and management?

Authors:  Nowaf Y Alobaidi; James A Stockley; Robert A Stockley; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  Ann Thorac Med       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.219

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.