Literature DB >> 11113792

Endosseous titanium implants as anchors for mesiodistal tooth movement in the beagle dog.

S Saito1, N Sugimoto, T Morohashi, M Ozeki, H Kurabayashi, H Shimizu, K Yamasaki, A Shiba, S Yamada, Y Shibasaki.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the anchorage potential of titanium implants (Branemark; 3.75 x 7 mm) with the use of a sectional arch wire technique for orthodontic mesiodistal tooth movement, as assessed by the osseointegration of implants and tooth movement. Two implants were surgically placed in healed mandibular extraction sites of the second and third premolars on each side in 4 adult male beagle dogs. The implants were surgically uncovered 18 weeks later, and second-stage abutments with soldered edgewise tubes were attached. Segmented edgewise rectangular archwires (0.017 x 0. 025 inch) with a T-loop or an L-loop were placed between the implants and the fourth premolars on both sides as the anchorage unit. One segment in each dog served as a loaded side, and the archwire was calibrated to produce 200 g of lateral force on the fourth premolar. The contralateral segment served as an unloaded side and was not subjected to orthodontic force. Sectional wires were activated biweekly 24, 28, 28, and 32 weeks, respectively, depending on the magnitude and the appearance of mesial tipping movement of the fourth premolar. After mandibular impressions were taken to measure the distance between the first molar and the fourth premolar, the animals were euthanized and dissected mandibles were prepared. The specimens were then embedded in polyester resin and cut to take backscattered electron images. On the basis of these images, the percentage of peri-implant bone volume was calculated and defined as an index of osseointegration. The differences between the initial and final fourth premolar to first molar distances varied (7.40, 8.85, 10.50, and 3.30 mm) on the loaded side, whereas the unloaded side showed no movement. Not only was there no statistical difference in the percent of peri-implant bone volume between the loaded and unloaded sides, but there was also no statistical difference between the compression and tension sides in both loaded and unloaded implants, which suggests that the implants maintained rigid osseointegration. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that endosseous titanium implants can function as anchors for long-term orthodontic mesiodistal movement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11113792     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.110636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of Anchorage Pattern under Two Types of Orthodontic Mini- Implant Loading During Retraction in Type A Anchorage Cases.

Authors:  B Imran Khan; Gowri Sankar Singaraju; Prasad Mandava; G Vivek Reddy; Venkatesh Nettam; Venkat Naidu Bhavikati
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-10-01

2.  Treatment of a Class II Case with Palatally Inserted Distalization Mechanics in an Epilepsy Patient.

Authors:  Sedef Sera Hepdarcan Sırman; Mustafa Özcan; Murat Tozlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-06-01

3.  Evaluation of the effect of force direction on stationary anchorage success of mini-implant with a lever-arm-shaped upper structure.

Authors:  Ki-Ho Park; Eun-Man Lee; Seung-Il Shin; Seong-Hun Kim; Young-Guk Park; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Accuracy of Mini-Implant Placement Using a Computer-Aided Designed Surgical Guide, with Information of Intraoral Scan and the Use of a Cone-Beam CT.

Authors:  Georgios Vasoglou; Ioanna Stefanidaki; Konstantinos Apostolopoulos; Evmorfia Fotakidou; Michail Vasoglou
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-08

5.  Osseointegration of orthodontic micro-screws after immediate and early loading.

Authors:  Linkun Zhang; Zhihe Zhao; Yu Li; Jiapei Wu; Leilei Zheng; Tian Tang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Long-term follow-up of dental single implants under immediate orthodontic load.

Authors:  Lisiane Meira Palagi; Carlos Eduardo Sabrosa; Eveline C B Gava; Tiziano Baccetti; Jose Augusto M Miguel
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 7.  Systematic review of mini-implant displacement under orthodontic loading.

Authors:  Manuel Nienkemper; Jörg Handschel; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.344

8.  Application of Orthodontic Immediate Force on Dental Implants: Histomorphologic and Histomorphometric Assessment.

Authors:  Mansour Rismanchian; Sayed Hamid Raji; Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Danesh Teimouri Rick; Amin Davoudi
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Jun

9.  Assessing double Acid-etched implants submitted to orthodontic forces and used as prosthetic anchorages in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  Rugani de Cravero Marta; Ibañez Juan Carlos
Journal:  Open Dent J       Date:  2008-03-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.