Literature DB >> 11108629

Quantitative gadopentetate-enhanced MRI of breast tumors: testing of different analytic methods.

T H Helbich1, T P Roberts, A Gossmann, M F Wendland, D M Shames, M Adachi, S Yang, S Huber, H Daldrup, R C Brasch.   

Abstract

This study assessed several proposed imaging strategies and analytic methods based on gadopentetate-enhanced MRI to differentiate benign from malignant breast tumors in a blinded experimental animal study. Steady-state dynamic MRI and first-pass imaging, performed with either T(1)- or T*(2)- weighted sequences, were compared. Semiquantitative and quantitative analysis methods, based on empirical measures of the data or physiological models, were subsequently applied to the imaging datasets. Comparative measures provided pathologic distinction of benign from malignant tumors, tumor grading, and histologic determination of microvascular density. Of the eight tested methods, only one, an estimate of first-pass perfusion using T *(2)-weighted imaging, showed an almost significant (P = 0.05) difference between benign and malignant tumors and correlated almost significantly (r =.3, P = 0.06) with the tumor grade. All other tests, performed either with steady-state imaging or with T(1)-weighted first-pass imaging, failed to differentiate benign from malignant tumors. In addition, they yielded poor correlations with tumor grade and microvascular density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108629     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2594(200012)44:6<915::aid-mrm13>3.0.co;2-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  8 in total

Review 1.  Clinical role of breast MRI now and going forward.

Authors:  D Leithner; G J Wengert; T H Helbich; S Thakur; R E Ochoa-Albiztegui; E A Morris; K Pinker
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 2.350

Review 2.  Imaging techniques: new avenues in cancer gene and cell therapy.

Authors:  Z Saadatpour; A Rezaei; H Ebrahimnejad; B Baghaei; G Bjorklund; M Chartrand; A Sahebkar; H Morovati; H R Mirzaei; H Mirzaei
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 5.987

3.  Delayed enhancement of ascites after i.v. contrast material administration at CT: time course and clinical correlation.

Authors:  Nancy Benedetti; Rizwan Aslam; Zhen J Wang; Bonnie N Joe; Yanjun Fu; Judy Yee; Benjamin M Yeh
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Invasive breast cancer: correlation of dynamic MR features with prognostic factors.

Authors:  Botond K Szabó; Peter Aspelin; Maria Kristoffersen Wiberg; Tibor Tot; Beata Boné
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Water-soluble Semiconducting Nanoparticles for Imaging.

Authors:  Chinessa T Adkins; Julia N Dobish; Scott Brown; Eva Harth
Journal:  ACS Macro Lett       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 6.903

6.  Diagnostic performance of initial enhancement analysis using ultra-fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast lesions.

Authors:  Mariko Goto; Koji Sakai; Hajime Yokota; Maki Kiba; Mariko Yoshida; Hiroshi Imai; Elisabeth Weiland; Isao Yokota; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Imaging and cancer: a review.

Authors:  Leonard Fass
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 7.449

8.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: the value of pharmacokinetic parameters derived from fast dynamic imaging during initial enhancement in classifying lesions.

Authors:  J Veltman; M Stoutjesdijk; R Mann; H J Huisman; J O Barentsz; J G Blickman; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.