Literature DB >> 11108092

Detecting blickets: how young children use information about novel causal powers in categorization and induction.

A Gopnik1, D M Sobel.   

Abstract

Three studies explored whether and when children could categorize objects on the basis of a novel underlying causal power. To test this we constructed a "blicket detector," a machine that lit up and played music when certain objects were placed on it. First, 2-, 3- and 4-year-old children saw that an object labeled as a "blicket" would set off the machine. In a categorization task, other objects were demonstrated on the machine. Some set it off and some did not. Children were asked to say which objects were "blickets." In an induction task, other objects were or were not labeled as "blickets." Children had to predict which objects would have the causal power to set off the machine. The causal power could conflict with perceptual properties of the object, such as color and shape. In an association task the object was associated with the machine's lighting up but did not cause it to light up. Even the youngest children sometimes used the causal power to determine the object's name rather than using its perceptual properties and sometimes used the object's name rather than its perceptual properties to predict the object's causal powers. Children rarely categorized the object on the basis of the associated event. Young children also sometimes made interesting memory errors-they incorrectly reported that objects with the same perceptual features had had the same causal power. These studies demonstrate that even very young children will easily and swiftly learn about a new causal power of an object and spontaneously use that information in classifying and naming the object.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11108092     DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  41 in total

1.  Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training.

Authors:  Pauline J Horne; C Fergus Lowe; Valerie R L Randle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Context shapes early diversity in abstract thought.

Authors:  Alexandra Carstensen; Jing Zhang; Gail D Heyman; Genyue Fu; Kang Lee; Caren M Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Conceptual knowledge increases infants' memory capacity.

Authors:  Lisa Feigenson; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Domains and naïve theories.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Nicholaus S Noles
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11-17

5.  The Blicket Within: Preschoolers' Inferences About Insides and Causes.

Authors:  David M Sobel; Caroline M Yoachim; Alison Gopnik; Andrew N Meltzoff; Emily J Blumenthal
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2007

6.  Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization.

Authors:  Hyowon Gweon; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Laura E Schulz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  From the structure of experience to concepts of structure: How the concept "cause" is attributed to objects and events.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2019-04

8.  Inconsistency with prior knowledge triggers children's causal explanatory reasoning.

Authors:  Cristine H Legare; Susan A Gelman; Henry M Wellman
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 May-Jun

9.  Early word-learning entails reference, not merely associations.

Authors:  Sandra R Waxman; Susan A Gelman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 10.  Child categorization.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Meredith Meyer
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-07-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.