Literature DB >> 11105522

Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.

M Naveh-Benjamin1, F I Craik, D Gavrilescu, N D Anderson.   

Abstract

Two experiments provide further information on the effects of divided attention (DA) on encoding and retrieval processes. The first experiment examined the effects of decision and motor difficulty of a concurrent reaction time task. A calibration analysis was used in the second experiment to test the hypothesis that shifting attentional emphasis away from encoding to the secondary task reduces the level of processing the to-be-remembered items receive. Overall, the results confirm and extend the conclusions of Craik, Govoni, Naveh-Benjamin, and Anderson (1996) and Naveh-Benjamin, Craik, Guez, and Dori (1998), by pointing to clear differences between encoding and retrieval processes: Encoding is affected by simultaneous task demands, especially those associated with "central" resources involved in conscious decision making, whereas retrieval is obligatory in that it is largely immune to the effects of simultaneous demands. The results of the calibration analysis suggest that one reason for the poorer memory performance as a result of DA at encoding is a qualitative shift to less deep, elaborative strategies.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11105522     DOI: 10.3758/bf03209344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  12 in total

1.  Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding.

Authors:  M A Fernandes; M Moscovitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2000-06

2.  Remembering operations.

Authors:  P A Kolers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1973-09

3.  PET studies of encoding and retrieval: The HERA model.

Authors:  L Nyberg; R Cabeza; E Tulving
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-06

4.  The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.

Authors:  N D Anderson; F I Craik; M Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-09

5.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

6.  Material-specific lateralization of prefrontal activation during episodic encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  A D Wagner; R A Poldrack; L L Eldridge; J E Desmond; G H Glover; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-11-16       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Functional brain maps of retrieval mode and recovery of episodic information.

Authors:  L Nyberg; E Tulving; R Habib; L G Nilsson; S Kapur; S Houle; R Cabeza; A R McIntosh
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1995-12-29       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Coding of spatial location information: an automatic process?

Authors:  M Naveh-Benjamin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The anatomy of memory.

Authors:  M Mishkin; T Appenzeller
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.142

10.  Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory.

Authors:  R T Kellogg; T Cocklin; L E Bourne
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1982
View more
  20 in total

1.  Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords.

Authors:  W P Wallace; T R Shaffer; M D Amberg; V L Silvers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

2.  What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Kensinger; Richard J Clarke; Suzanne Corkin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  fMRI differences in encoding and retrieval of pictures due to encoding strategy in the elderly.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mandzia; Sandra E Black; Mary Pat McAndrews; Cheryl Grady; Simon Graham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  The effects of divided attention at encoding on item and associative memory.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Jonathan Guez; Michal Marom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

5.  Effects of divided attention and speeded responding on implicit and explicit retrieval of artificial grammar knowledge.

Authors:  Shaun Helman; Dianne C Berry
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

6.  Age-related differences in immediate serial recall: dissociating chunk formation and capacity.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Nelson Cowan; Angela Kilb; Zhijian Chen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

7.  The role of attention in the associative binding of emotionally arousing words.

Authors:  Geoffrey B Maddox; Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Susan Old; Angela Kilb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

8.  Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: further support for an asymmetry.

Authors:  Moshe Naveh-Benjamin; Angela Kilb; Tyler Fisher
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-01

9.  The effects of attention on age-related relational memory deficits: evidence from a novel attentional manipulation.

Authors:  So-Yeon Kim; Kelly S Giovanello
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-09

10.  That's a good idea, but let's keep thinking! Can we prevent our initial ideas from being forgotten as a consequence of thinking of new ideas?

Authors:  Annie S Ditta; Benjamin C Storm
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.