Literature DB >> 11105211

Assessment of the population structure of five Finnish dog breeds with microsatellites.

M T Koskinen1, P Bredbacka.   

Abstract

Genetic variabilities within and between Finnish populations of Golden Retrievers, German Shepherds, Wirehaired Dachshunds, Pembroke Welsh Corgis and Bedlington Terriers were quantified with microsatellite allele numbers, observed heterozygosities, expected heterozygosities, FIS estimates, FST estimates and DS distances. In a sample of 50 individuals from each, breed and ten polymorphic loci, the highest genetic diversity was exhibited in the Wirehaired Dachshunds and lowest in the Bedlington Terriers. Although statistically significant deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg (H-W) equilibrium were observed, they occurred at an unexpectedly low frequency. Most strikingly, the extremely small Bedlington Terrier population displayed genotypes in H-W proportions in all investigated loci. The H-W deviations always occurred with positive FIS estimates, which, on average, were not larger than values reported for free-living canids. Genetic differentiation between the breeds was very large. As a comparison, present estimates were, on average, over two times higher than previously observed between breeds of sheep, and over two times higher than the highest estimates reported between human populations. Moreover, the highest DS distances were only slightly lower than the lowest values inferred between humans and chimpanzees. Severe bottlenecks in the recent past of the examined breeds were not statistically supported. The presented data imply genetic isolation and intense artificial selection in the history of these breeds of dogs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11105211     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2052.2000.00669.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Genet        ISSN: 0268-9146            Impact factor:   3.169


  9 in total

1.  Is a multivariate consensus representation of genetic relationships among populations always meaningful?

Authors:  K Moazami-Goudarzi; D Laloë
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  From caveman companion to medical innovator: genomic insights into the origin and evolution of domestic dogs.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker; Samuel F Gilbert
Journal:  Adv Genomics Genet       Date:  2015-06-12

3.  Genomic analyses of modern dog breeds.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Breed relationships facilitate fine-mapping studies: a 7.8-kb deletion cosegregates with Collie eye anomaly across multiple dog breeds.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker; Anna V Kukekova; Dayna T Akey; Orly Goldstein; Ewen F Kirkness; Kathleen C Baysac; Dana S Mosher; Gustavo D Aguirre; Gregory M Acland; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Microsatellite characterization of Cimarron Uruguayo dogs.

Authors:  Rosa Gagliardi; Silvia Llambí; Cristina García; María Victoria Arruga
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 1.771

Review 6.  Canine genomics and genetics: running with the pack.

Authors:  Heidi G Parker; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Studies of modern Italian dog populations reveal multiple patterns for domestic breed evolution.

Authors:  Andrea Talenti; Dayna L Dreger; Stefano Frattini; Michele Polli; Stefano Marelli; Alexander C Harris; Luigi Liotta; Raffaella Cocco; Andrew N Hogan; Daniele Bigi; Romolo Caniglia; Heidi G Parker; Giulio Pagnacco; Elaine A Ostrander; Paola Crepaldi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Assortative mating and fragmentation within dog breeds.

Authors:  Susanne Björnerfeldt; Frank Hailer; Maria Nord; Carles Vilà
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-01-28       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Genetic variations and dog breed identification using inter-simple sequence repeat markers coupled with high resolution melting analysis.

Authors:  Wannapimol Kriangwanich; Korakot Nganvongpanit; Kittisak Buddhachat; Puntita Siengdee; Siriwadee Chomdej; Siriluck Ponsuksili; Chatchote Thitaram
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.