BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare the biochemical outcomes of patients treated with Pd-103/I-125 brachytherapy alone vs. brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for early stage prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Brachytherapy monotherapy was used in 403 patients. Brachytherapy was combined with 45 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 231 patients. Median follow-up was 58 months. To compare the biochemical outcomes of these two treatment approaches, patients were stratified into three relative risk groups: low risk, T(1)-T(2), Gleason 2-6/10, PSA< or =10.0; intermediate risk, T(3), Gleason 7-10/10, PSA>10.0 (one factor); high risk, T(3), Gleason 7-10/10, PSA>10.0 (two factors). RESULTS: The actuarial biochemical progression-free rate (bNED) for the entire 634 patients was 85% at 10 years. The bNED outcomes by risk group for monotherapy vs. combined therapy respectively were: low risk, 94 vs. 87%; intermediate risk, 84 vs. 85%; high risk, 54 vs. 62%. These differences did not reach statistical significance for any risk group. Rectal morbidity was slightly greater in the combined treatment patients. CONCLUSION: Although the addition of external beam irradiation to brachytherapy is conceptually appealing for patients with higher risk prostate carcinoma, we were unable to demonstrate a benefit. Whether this is because of patient selection biases within the risk groupings, an artefact of retrospective review, or because external radiotherapy does not offer additional benefit is uncertain.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To compare the biochemical outcomes of patients treated with Pd-103/I-125 brachytherapy alone vs. brachytherapy combined with external beam radiotherapy for early stage prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Brachytherapy monotherapy was used in 403 patients. Brachytherapy was combined with 45 Gy of external beam radiotherapy in 231 patients. Median follow-up was 58 months. To compare the biochemical outcomes of these two treatment approaches, patients were stratified into three relative risk groups: low risk, T(1)-T(2), Gleason 2-6/10, PSA< or =10.0; intermediate risk, T(3), Gleason 7-10/10, PSA>10.0 (one factor); high risk, T(3), Gleason 7-10/10, PSA>10.0 (two factors). RESULTS: The actuarial biochemical progression-free rate (bNED) for the entire 634 patients was 85% at 10 years. The bNED outcomes by risk group for monotherapy vs. combined therapy respectively were: low risk, 94 vs. 87%; intermediate risk, 84 vs. 85%; high risk, 54 vs. 62%. These differences did not reach statistical significance for any risk group. Rectal morbidity was slightly greater in the combined treatment patients. CONCLUSION: Although the addition of external beam irradiation to brachytherapy is conceptually appealing for patients with higher risk prostate carcinoma, we were unable to demonstrate a benefit. Whether this is because of patient selection biases within the risk groupings, an artefact of retrospective review, or because external radiotherapy does not offer additional benefit is uncertain.
Authors: George Rodrigues; Xiaomei Yao; D Andrew Loblaw; Michael Brundage; Joseph L Chin Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Stefan Machtens; Rolf Baumann; Jörn Hagemann; Antje Warszawski; Andreas Meyer; Johann H Karstens; Udo Jonas Journal: World J Urol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Wenge Liu; Jonathan McDaniel; Xinghai Li; Daisuke Asai; Felipe Garcia Quiroz; Jeffery Schaal; Ji Sun Park; Michael Zalutsky; Ashutosh Chilkoti Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701