Literature DB >> 11102889

K-ras oncogene subtype mutations are associated with survival but not expression of p53, p16(INK4A), p21(WAF-1), cyclin D1, erbB-2 and erbB-3 in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

A Kawesha1, P Ghaneh, A Andrén-Sandberg, D Ograed, R Skar, S Dawiskiba, J D Evans, F Campbell, N Lemoine, J P Neoptolemos.   

Abstract

Previous studies of molecular prognostic markers following resection for exocrine pancreatic cancer have produced conflicting results. Our aim was to undertake a comprehensive analysis of potentially useful molecular markers in a large, multicentre patient population and to compare these markers with standard pathological prognostic variables. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were analysed from 157 patients [100 men and 57 women with a median (range) age of 60 (33-77) years] who had undergone pancreatectomy. Immunohistochemistry was used to detect expression of p16(INK4), p53, p21(WAF1), cyclin D1, erbB-2 and erbB-3. Mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the K-ras oncogene were detected by SSCP and sequencing following DNA extraction and amplification by PCR. The median (range) survival post-resection was 12.5 (3-83) months. Abnormalities of p16(INK4), p53, p21(WAF1), cyclin D1, erbB-2 and erbB-3 expression were found in 87%, 41%, 75%, 72%, 33% and 57% of cases, respectively. There was no significant correlation between expression of any of these markers and patient survival. K-ras mutations were found in 73 (75%) of 97 cases with amplifiable DNA. The presence of K-ras mutation alone did not correlate with survival, but there were significant differences in survival according to the type of K-ras mutation (p = 0.0007). Reduced survival was found in patients with GaT, cGT and GcT K-ras mutations compared to GtT, aGT and GaC mutations. In conclusion, survival was associated with type of K-ras mutation but not expression of p16(INK4), p53, p21(WAF1), cyclin D1, erbB-2 and erbB-3. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11102889     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0215(20001120)89:6<469::aid-ijc1>3.0.co;2-l

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  42 in total

Review 1.  Trials of gene therapy for pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher M Halloran; Paula Ghaneh; Eithne Costello; John P Neoptolemos
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2005-06

2.  Ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: Expression of growth factor receptors, oncogenes and suppressor genes, and their relationship to pathological features, staging and survival.

Authors:  Antonio Lozano-Leon; Begona Vieites Perez-Quintela; Julio Iglesias-García; Jose Lariño-Noia; Evaristo Varo; Jeronimo Forteza; J Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Prognostic value of K-ras mutation status and subtypes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens from patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Ogura; Kenji Yamao; Kazuo Hara; Nobumasa Mizuno; Susumu Hijioka; Hiroshi Imaoka; Akira Sawaki; Yasumasa Niwa; Masahiro Tajika; Shinya Kondo; Tsutomu Tanaka; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Vikram Bhatia; Kazuhide Higuchi; Waki Hosoda; Yasushi Yatabe
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 4.  KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations, and patient prognosis in 126 pancreatic cancers: pyrosequencing technology and literature review.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Yoshifumi Baba; Yuki Kitano; Keisuke Miyake; Xiaobo Zhang; Kensuke Yamamura; Keisuke Kosumi; Takayoshi Kaida; Kota Arima; Katsunobu Taki; Takaaki Higashi; Katsunori Imai; Daisuke Hashimoto; Yoichi Yamashita; Akira Chikamoto; Toru Beppu; Xiaodong Tan; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.064

5.  Clinical significance of K-ras and c-erbB-2 mutations in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Renata Talar-Wojnarowska; Anita Gasiorowska; Beata Smolarz; Hanna Romanowicz-Makowska; Janusz Strzelczyk; Adam Janiak; Andrzej Kulig; Ewa Malecka-Panas
Journal:  Int J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Survival after surgical management of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: does curative and radical surgery truly exist?

Authors:  H G Smeenk; T C K Tran; J Erdmann; C H J van Eijck; J Jeekel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-14       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Tailoring to RB: tumour suppressor status and therapeutic response.

Authors:  Erik S Knudsen; Karen E Knudsen
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  TGF-beta and p53 staining in CT-guided and endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspirates of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dawn Sears; Richard A Erickson; Lubna Sayage-Rabie; Martha C Escobar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Clinical significance of p16 protein expression loss and aberrant p53 protein expression in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Joon Jeong; Young Nyun Park; Joon Seong Park; Dong-Sup Yoon; Hoon Sang Chi; Byong Ro Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 2.759

10.  p53 protein expression and CA19.9 values in differential cytological diagnosis of pancreatic cancer complicated with chronic pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  De-Qing Mu; Guo-Feng Wang; Shu-You Peng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.