Literature DB >> 22983505

Prognostic value of K-ras mutation status and subtypes in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens from patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Takeshi Ogura1, Kenji Yamao, Kazuo Hara, Nobumasa Mizuno, Susumu Hijioka, Hiroshi Imaoka, Akira Sawaki, Yasumasa Niwa, Masahiro Tajika, Shinya Kondo, Tsutomu Tanaka, Yasuhiro Shimizu, Vikram Bhatia, Kazuhide Higuchi, Waki Hosoda, Yasushi Yatabe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although recent reports indicate that K-ras mutation status is a biomarker that acts as a prognostic factor, only a few analyses of K-ras mutation subtypes have been published. In addition, there are no reports that analyze overall survival and prognostic factors according to K-ras mutation status and subtypes in only unresectable pancreatic cancer (PC) determined from tissues obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 242 patients who were diagnosed as having unresectable PC with available histological diagnosis. Clinical data collected included sex, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9, primary tumor location, stage (local or metastatic) according to TNM staging, first-line chemotherapy, K-ras mutation status and subtypes (G12D, G12V, and G12R), and overall survival. We analyzed the negative prognostic factors for reduced overall survival in unresectable PC patients using these data.
RESULTS: From multivariate analysis, CA19-9 ≥1000 U/ml (hazard ratio [HR] 1.78, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.46, P < 0.01), metastatic stage (HR 2.26, 95 % CI 1.58-3.24, P < 0.01), and mutant-K-ras (HR 1.76, 95 % CI 1.03-3.01, P = 0.04) were negative prognostic factors, indicating a reduced survival. Among the patients who had K-ras mutation subtypes, CA19-9 ≥1000 U/ml (HR 1.65, 95 % CI 1.12-2.37, P < 0.01), metastatic stage (HR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.44-3.14, P < 0.01), and the presence of the G12D or G12R mutations (HR 1.60, 95 % CI 1.11-2.28) were negative prognostic factors for overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: K-ras mutation status and subtypes may be associated with survival duration in pancreatic cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22983505     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-012-0664-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  31 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  A L Warshaw; C Fernández-del Castillo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-02-13       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  CA 19-9 as a predictor for response and survival in advanced pancreatic cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Woong Sub Koom; Jinsil Seong; Yong Bae Kim; Hae Ok Pyun; Si Young Song
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Differences in in vitro invasive capacity induced by differences in Ki-Ras protein mutations.

Authors:  F Al-Mulla; E M MacKenzie
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  The clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  K J Chang; P Nguyen; R A Erickson; T E Durbin; K D Katz
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Molecular analysis of the EGFR-RAS-RAF pathway in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas: lack of mutations in the BRAF and EGFR genes.

Authors:  Heike Immervoll; Dag Hoem; Kalaiarasy Kugarajh; Solrun J Steine; Anders Molven
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Association of K-ras codon 12 transversions with short survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  F Vega; P Iniesta; T Caldes; A Sanchez; J Lopez; C Dejuan; E Diazrubio; A Torres; J Balibrea; M Benito
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.650

8.  Clinical application of ras gene mutation for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Tada; M Omata; M Ohto
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  A detailed analysis of K-ras point mutations in relation to tumor progression and survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  M Span; P T Moerkerk; A F De Goeij; J W Arends
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1996-06-21       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 10.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (EUS-FNAB): past, present, and future.

Authors:  Kenji Yamao; Akira Sawaki; Nobumasa Mizuno; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Yasushi Yatabe; Takashi Koshikawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.772

View more
  51 in total

Review 1.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the molecular diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Bournet; Marion Gayral; Jérôme Torrisani; Janick Selves; Pierre Cordelier; Louis Buscail
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Translational research in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: current evidence and future concepts.

Authors:  Stephan Kruger; Michael Haas; Steffen Ormanns; Sibylle Bächmann; Jens T Siveke; Thomas Kirchner; Volker Heinemann; Stefan Boeck
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration and useful ancillary methods.

Authors:  Mario Tadic; Tajana Stoos-Veic; Rajko Kusec
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  KRAS mutation status is not predictive for objective response to anti-EGFR treatment with erlotinib in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Stefan Boeck; Andreas Jung; Rüdiger P Laubender; Jens Neumann; Rosalind Egg; Clara Goritschan; Steffen Ormanns; Michael Haas; Dominik P Modest; Thomas Kirchner; Volker Heinemann
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 5.  KRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutations, and patient prognosis in 126 pancreatic cancers: pyrosequencing technology and literature review.

Authors:  Lei Zhou; Yoshifumi Baba; Yuki Kitano; Keisuke Miyake; Xiaobo Zhang; Kensuke Yamamura; Keisuke Kosumi; Takayoshi Kaida; Kota Arima; Katsunobu Taki; Takaaki Higashi; Katsunori Imai; Daisuke Hashimoto; Yoichi Yamashita; Akira Chikamoto; Toru Beppu; Xiaodong Tan; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Phase I/II Study of Refametinib (BAY 86-9766) in Combination with Gemcitabine in Advanced Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Van Laethem; Hanno Riess; Jacek Jassem; Michael Haas; Uwe M Martens; Colin Weekes; Marc Peeters; Paul Ross; John Bridgewater; Bohuslav Melichar; Stefano Cascinu; Piotr Saramak; Patrick Michl; David Van Brummelen; Alberto Zaniboni; Wollf Schmiegel; Svein Dueland; Marius Giurescu; Vittorio L Garosi; Katrin Roth; Anke Schulz; Henrik Seidel; Prabhu Rajagopalan; Michael Teufel; Barrett H Childs
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 7.  RAS isoforms and mutations in cancer at a glance.

Authors:  G Aaron Hobbs; Channing J Der; Kent L Rossman
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 8.  RAS signaling and anti-RAS therapy: lessons learned from genetically engineered mouse models, human cancer cells, and patient-related studies.

Authors:  Bingliang Fang
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 3.848

9.  Reliable Detection of Somatic Mutations in Fine Needle Aspirates of Pancreatic Cancer With Next-generation Sequencing: Implications for Surgical Management.

Authors:  Vicente Valero; Tyler J Saunders; Jin He; Matthew J Weiss; John L Cameron; Avani Dholakia; Aaron T Wild; Eun Ji Shin; Mouen A Khashab; Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon; Syed Z Ali; Daniel Laheru; Ralph H Hruban; Christine A Iacobuzio-Donahue; Joseph M Herman; Christopher L Wolfgang
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Cell-block procedure in endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine-needle-aspiration of gastrointestinal solid neoplastic lesions.

Authors:  Antonio Ieni; Valeria Barresi; Paolo Todaro; Rosario Alberto Caruso; Giovanni Tuccari
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.