Literature DB >> 11102694

Competition between methanogenesis and quinone respiration for ecologically important substrates in anaerobic consortia.

.   

Abstract

Anaerobic consortia obtained from a wide variety of environments were tested for oxidizing several ecologically significant substrates with the humic model compound, anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS), as terminal electron acceptor. All the substrates, including hydrogen, acetate, propionate, methanol and lactate, were completely or partially converted to methane when bicarbonate was the only electron acceptor available. Addition of AQDS (20 mM) to the cultures prevented methanogenesis in most cases and AQDS reduction became the preferred pathway. AQDS was shown to be toxic for methanogenesis and this effect played an important role in enabling quinone-respiring bacteria to outcompete methanogens. Furthermore, AQDS respiration is thermodynamically more favorable than methanogenesis. All the consortia evaluated were capable of oxidizing hydrogen linked to the reduction of AQDS. Most inocula tested were also able to oxidize acetate and lactate in the same way. When methanol was provided as an electron donor competition between methanogenesis and acetogenesis occurred. Acetate accumulated from the latter process was responsible for quinone respiration. These results suggest that quinone-respiring bacteria are ubiquitous and that quinones in humus may significantly contribute to carbon cycling process by serving as a terminal electron acceptor for the anaerobic microbial oxidation of a wide variety of ecologically important substrates.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11102694     DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00766.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  9 in total

1.  Phylogeny of acetate-utilizing microorganisms in soils along a nutrient gradient in the Florida Everglades.

Authors:  Ashvini Chauhan; Andrew Ogram
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Anaerobic mineralization of toluene by enriched sediments with quinones and humus as terminal electron acceptors.

Authors:  F J Cervantes; W Dijksma; T Duong-Dac; A Ivanova; G Lettinga; J A Field
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Extracellular quinones affecting methane production and methanogenic community in paddy soil.

Authors:  Jielong Xu; Li Zhuang; Guiqin Yang; Yong Yuan; Shungui Zhou
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 4.552

Review 4.  Methanotrophs: Discoveries, Environmental Relevance, and a Perspective on Current and Future Applications.

Authors:  Simon Guerrero-Cruz; Annika Vaksmaa; Marcus A Horn; Helge Niemann; Maite Pijuan; Adrian Ho
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Electron Transfer between Electrically Conductive Minerals and Quinones.

Authors:  Olga Taran
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 5.221

6.  A Membrane-Bound Cytochrome Enables Methanosarcina acetivorans To Conserve Energy from Extracellular Electron Transfer.

Authors:  Dawn E Holmes; Toshiyuki Ueki; Hai-Yan Tang; Jinjie Zhou; Jessica A Smith; Gina Chaput; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 7.867

7.  Humic Substances Mediate Anaerobic Methane Oxidation Linked to Nitrous Oxide Reduction in Wetland Sediments.

Authors:  Edgardo I Valenzuela; Claudia Padilla-Loma; Nicolás Gómez-Hernández; Nguyen E López-Lozano; Sergio Casas-Flores; Francisco J Cervantes
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Carbon Materials Advancing Microorganisms in Driving Soil Organic Carbon Regulation.

Authors:  Chunyu Tang; Fan Yang; Markus Antonietti
Journal:  Research (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-01-12

9.  Linking microbial Sphagnum degradation and acetate mineralization in acidic peat bogs: from global insights to a genome-centric case study.

Authors:  Andrew R St James; Joseph B Yavitt; Stephen H Zinder; Ruth E Richardson
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 10.302

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.