| Literature DB >> 11102442 |
C M Hosfield1, T Moldoveanu, P L Davies, J S Elce, Z Jia.
Abstract
The ubiquitous calpain isoforms (mu- and m-calpain) are Ca(2+)-dependent cysteine proteases that require surprisingly high Ca(2+) concentrations for activation in vitro ( approximately 50 and approximately 300 microm, respectively). The molecular basis of such a high requirement for Ca(2+) in vitro is not known. In this study, we substantially reduced the concentration of Ca(2+) required for the activation of m-calpain in vitro through the specific disruption of interdomain interactions by structure-guided site-directed mutagenesis. Several interdomain electrostatic interactions involving lysine residues in domain II and acidic residues in the C(2)-like domain III were disrupted, and the effects of these mutations on activity and Ca(2+) sensitivity were analyzed. The mutation to serine of Glu-504, a residue that is conserved in both mu- and m-calpain and interacts most notably with Lys-234, reduced the in vitro Ca(2+) requirement for activity by almost 50%. The mutation of Lys-234 to serine or glutamic acid resulted in a similar reduction. These are the first reported cases in which point mutations have been able to reduce the Ca(2+) requirement of calpain. The structures of the mutants in the absence of Ca(2+) were shown by x-ray crystallography to be unchanged from the wild type, demonstrating that the increase in Ca(2+) sensitivity was not attributable to conformational change prior to activation. The conservation of sequence between mu-calpain, m-calpain, and calpain 3 in this region suggests that the results can be extended to all of these isoforms. Whereas the primary Ca(2+) binding is assumed to occur at EF-hands in domains IV and VI, these results show that domain II-domain III salt bridges are important in the process of the Ca(2+)-induced activation of calpain and that they influence the overall Ca(2+) requirement of the enzyme.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 11102442 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M007352200
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biol Chem ISSN: 0021-9258 Impact factor: 5.157