OBJECTIVE: To find whether externally induced prescriptions (EIP) condition attendance through their prevalence, quality, the degree of agreement of the PC doctor and his/her capacity to alter them. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of use of indication-prescription type medicines. SETTING: Health district. PARTICIPANTS: 2656 prescriptions for 678 patients interviewed. MEASUREMENTS: Each interview recorded: type of visit, age, sex, work situation, existence or otherwise of social problems and/or psychiatric pathology; doctor-patient relationship, pharmaceutical preparations (PP) prescribed and those which the patient remembers he/she is taking, indication, origin, duration, speciality of the prescribing person, agreement of the PC doctor issuing the prescription and the possibility of his/her changing it. For each prescription the following was analysed: therapeutic group, intrinsic value, time it lasts, cost and whether it is a recently marketed PP. MAIN RESULTS: 90% of visits to the doctor end in prescription. 58% of patients remember taking one or more EIP. 72% of the prescriptions analysed were externally caused. They came mostly from the public health system (66%), private medicine (20%) and self-medication (11%). There was no PC agreement with almost half these EIPs, but only 13% could be changed. The EIPs without agreement and without possibility of change were greater in: women, the elderly, people on a pension, psychiatric pathologies and in cases of bad doctor-patient relationship. The EIPs originated in health insurance companies, pharmacies, self-medication, former GPs and private doctors. They were associated with ill-defined signs and symptoms, circulatory diseases and locomotive disease. We found no significant differences in expenditure or use of PP recently put onto the market between self-medication and EIP, though there were in quality. CONCLUSIONS: The current model of prescribing medication causes consultations to be greatly "medicinised" at the expense of EIP. Doctors only alter a small part of the EIPs they don't agree with. Longitudinal studies are needed to monitor patients to find the evolution of EIPs (withdrawal, replacement, dragging on or new external prescription).
OBJECTIVE: To find whether externally induced prescriptions (EIP) condition attendance through their prevalence, quality, the degree of agreement of the PC doctor and his/her capacity to alter them. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of use of indication-prescription type medicines. SETTING: Health district. PARTICIPANTS: 2656 prescriptions for 678 patients interviewed. MEASUREMENTS: Each interview recorded: type of visit, age, sex, work situation, existence or otherwise of social problems and/or psychiatric pathology; doctor-patient relationship, pharmaceutical preparations (PP) prescribed and those which the patient remembers he/she is taking, indication, origin, duration, speciality of the prescribing person, agreement of the PC doctor issuing the prescription and the possibility of his/her changing it. For each prescription the following was analysed: therapeutic group, intrinsic value, time it lasts, cost and whether it is a recently marketed PP. MAIN RESULTS: 90% of visits to the doctor end in prescription. 58% of patients remember taking one or more EIP. 72% of the prescriptions analysed were externally caused. They came mostly from the public health system (66%), private medicine (20%) and self-medication (11%). There was no PC agreement with almost half these EIPs, but only 13% could be changed. The EIPs without agreement and without possibility of change were greater in: women, the elderly, people on a pension, psychiatric pathologies and in cases of bad doctor-patient relationship. The EIPs originated in health insurance companies, pharmacies, self-medication, former GPs and private doctors. They were associated with ill-defined signs and symptoms, circulatory diseases and locomotive disease. We found no significant differences in expenditure or use of PP recently put onto the market between self-medication and EIP, though there were in quality. CONCLUSIONS: The current model of prescribing medication causes consultations to be greatly "medicinised" at the expense of EIP. Doctors only alter a small part of the EIPs they don't agree with. Longitudinal studies are needed to monitor patients to find the evolution of EIPs (withdrawal, replacement, dragging on or new external prescription).
Authors: M J Montero Fernández; F J Rodríguez Alcalá; N Valles Fernández; F López de Castro; M Esteban Tudela; B Cordero García Journal: Aten Primaria Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 1.137