Literature DB >> 11099554

Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques.

P F McSherry1, H Bradley.   

Abstract

The correction of Class II malocclusions has been hampered by the use of appliances which require the patient to co-operate with headgear, elastics, or the wearing of a removable appliance. 'Non-compliance therapy' involves the use of appliances which minimize the need for such co-operation and attempt to maximize the predictability of results. This article reviews and describes the types of appliances used, and their mode of action-based on the current available research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11099554     DOI: 10.1179/ortho.27.3.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN: 1465-3125


  15 in total

Review 1.  Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Niko C Bock; Julia von Bremen; Sabine Ruf
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.

Authors:  Gero Stefan Michael Kinzinger; Jörg Alexander Lisson; Linda Frye; Ulrich Gross; Jan Hourfar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Treatment and posttreatment outcomes induced by the Mandibular Advancement Repositioning Appliance; a controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Luis Tomas Huanca Ghislanzoni; Douglas Edward Toll; Efisio Defraia; Tiziano Baccetti; Lorenzo Franchi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Treatment efficiency of mini-implant-borne distalization depending on age and second-molar eruption.

Authors:  M Nienkemper; B Wilmes; A Pauls; S Yamaguchi; B Ludwig; D Drescher
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Evaluation of palatal bone density in adults and adolescents for application of skeletal anchorage devices.

Authors:  Seong Han; Mohamed Bayome; Jeongwon Lee; Yoon-Jin Lee; Hae-Hiang Song; Yoon-Ah Kook
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Fabrication and evaluation of a noncompliant molar distalizing appliance: bonded molar distalizer.

Authors:  A Sodagar; M S Ahmad Akhoundi; A Rafighii; S Arab
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2011-09-30

7.  Treatment effects of R-appliance and anterior inclined bite plate in class II, division I malocclusion.

Authors:  Rahman Showkatbakhsh; Shahin Emami Meybodi; Abdolreza Jamilian; Seyyed Amir Reza Fatahi Meybodi; Elham Morshedi Meybodi
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

8.  A comparison of the treatment effects of the Forsus Fatigue Resistance Device and the Twin Block appliance in patients with class II malocclusions.

Authors:  Abdulfatah Hanoun; Thikriat S Al-Jewair; Sawsan Tabbaa; Mhd Amer Allaymouni; Charles B Preston
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2014-08-02

9.  Three-dimensional analysis of the distal movement of maxillary 1st molars in patients fitted with mini-implant-aided trans-palatal arches.

Authors:  Amirfarhang Miresmaeili; Ahmad Sajedi; Abbas Moghimbeigi; Nasrin Farhadian
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Class III correction using an inter-arch spring-loaded module.

Authors:  Robert Vanlaecken; Michael O Williams; Thomas Razmus; Erdogan Gunel; Chris Martin; Peter Ngan
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.