Literature DB >> 1109768

Concepts for systemic treatment of micrometastases.

F M Schabel.   

Abstract

If total tumor cell kill is a requirement for "cure," as it probably is for at least some tumors, treatment of micrometastases containing less than or equal to 10-6 viable tumor cells is a problem facing all cancer therapists. Metastatic tumor cell foci of less than or equal to 10-6 cells, particularly if widely disseminated, are, in the main, grossly undetectable and are, therefore, the proper targets for the chemotherapist and the immunotherapist. Current knowledge of tumor cell population growth kinetics indicates that the growth fraction (viable cells undergoing active cell replication) is inversely related to population size. Micrometastases should, therefore, be more sensitive to antimetabolite (cell-cycle-specific) anticancer drugs than the larger, grossly apparent, primary tumor from which they were derived. In fact, drug response of the primarytumor may not reliably predict the sensitivity of micrometastases to cell-cycle-specific drugs. In addition, optimal drug treatment scheduling for effective, but noncurative, drugs against clinically recognized tumors may not predict optimal scheduling of the same drugs against micrometastases. This is shown particularly in cell-cycle-specific drugs, since the generation time of tumor cells in small population foci (less than 10-7 cells) is often significantly shorter than in larger population foci (greater than 10-7 cells). Since first-order cell kill kinetics characterizes effective drug kill of tumor cells and the best currently known anticancer drugs have variable but generally limited tumor cell kill potential, drug treatment of likely micrometastases should be started as soon after the end of likely noncurative radiologic or surgical treatment as possible. Experimental data indicating that significantly smaller numbers of viable tumor cells can establish lethal tumors in the presence of radiation-inactivated tumor cells than in their absence suggest that small populations of residual viable tumor cells in radiation-treated tumor sites may be a greater threat to clinical cure than similar sized populations remaining in situ after surgery. Experimental data supporting the above concepts are presented and discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1109768     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(197501)35:1<15::aid-cncr2820350104>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  31 in total

Review 1.  Paradoxical signal transduction in neurobiological systems.

Authors:  F C Colpaert; Y Frégnac
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2001 Aug-Dec       Impact factor: 5.590

2.  Biological features and chemosensitivity of human colorectal cancer xenografted in nude mice.

Authors:  K Yamada
Journal:  Gastroenterol Jpn       Date:  1987-10

3.  Chemotherapy in stage II testicular tumours: preliminary communication.

Authors:  K Höffken; C G Schmidt
Journal:  Z Krebsforsch Klin Onkol Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1976-05-03

4.  Biological heterogeneity and radiation sensitivity of in vitro propagated lung metastatic lines originated from a transplantable squamous cell carcinoma of BALB/c mouse.

Authors:  R J Jamasbi; E H Perkins
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol       Date:  1990-03

5.  Adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer.

Authors:  P Schlag
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Implications of tumor progression on clinical oncology.

Authors:  D R Welch; S P Tomasovic
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1985 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 7.  Intraportal chemotherapy for colorectal hepatic metastases.

Authors:  U T Laffer; U Metzger
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Postoperative chemotherapy including intraperitoneal and intradermal administration of the streptococcal preparation OK-432 for patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal dissemination: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  K Sugimachi; Y Maehara; K Akazawa; Y Kondo; Y Kunii; M Kitamura; H Yamaoka; Y Takahashi; T Kito; M Katou
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.333

9.  [Multidrug chemotherapy of osteogenic sarcoma (author's transl)].

Authors:  G Prindull
Journal:  Blut       Date:  1979-10

10.  The combined modality approach in the treatment of inoperable small-cell anaplastic carcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  R Osieka; C G Schmidt; H B Makoski; E Scherer
Journal:  Z Krebsforsch Klin Onkol Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1977-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.