Literature DB >> 11096244

Carcinological risks and retroperitoneal laparoscopy.

A Cicco1, L Salomon, H Hoznek, W Alame, F Saint, M P Bralet, P Antiphon, D K Chopin, C C Abbou.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of trocar site spillage, local recurrence, and metastatic disease associated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic tumor resection.
METHODS: From 1994 to 1999, 228 retroperitoneal laparoscopic procedures were performed at our institution. Fifty-six procedures (24.6%) were for malignancies and comprised 41 radical nephrectomies and 8 partial nephrectomies for renal tumors, and 7 nephro-ureterectomies for renal pelvis tumors. The pathological stage and the status of surgical margins were noted according to the 1997 TNM classification. Postoperative follow-up data were obtained by means of physical and radiological examinations after 1 and 3 months, and then half-yearly. Trocar site seeding, local recurrence and metastatic disease were recorded. Kaplan-Meier actuarial analysis was used to determine the disease-free survival likelihood.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 24.9+/-13.85 months. All the patients had tumor-free surgical margins. No laparoscopic trocar site recurrences were identified. For laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: one patient had a local recurrence with hepatic metastasis of a pT(3)G(2) tumor after 9 months and died 19.7 months after the procedure. One patient with a pT(3a)G(3)M+ tumor died 23.1 months after radical nephrectomy without any sign of local recurrence. For laparoscopic nephro-ureterectomy: one patient with a pT(3)G(3) tumor had a local recurrence 12.1 months after the procedure and died 26.6 months after surgery. One patient with a pT(1)G(2) renal pelvis tumor had bone metastasis at 9 months and died 29 months after the procedure. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial disease-free survival rate was 91% at 54 months for radical nephrectomy, 61% at 30 months for nephro-ureterectomy and 100% at 49 months for partial nephrectomy.
CONCLUSION: Malignancies of the upper urinary tract can be managed by means of retroperitoneal laparoscopy. Short-term results suggest that this procedure is not associated with an increased risk of portsite or local recurrence, and that disease-free survival is equivalent to that obtained with open surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11096244     DOI: 10.1159/000020339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  6 in total

Review 1.  Retroperitoneal renal laparoscopy.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  The laparoscopic nephrectomy learning curve: a single centre's development of a de novo practice.

Authors:  J Phillips; J W F Catto; V Lavin; D Doyle; D J Smith; K J Hastie; N E Oakley
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: intermediate oncological results.

Authors:  Stéphane Larré; Chaker Kanso; Alexandre De La Taille; Andras Hoznek; Dimitrios Vordos; René Yiou; Clément-Claude Abbou; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Oncological risk of laparoscopic surgery in urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Morgan Rouprêt; Gordon Smyth; Jacques Irani; Laurent Guy; Jean-Louis Davin; Fabien Saint; Christian Pfister; Hervé Wallerand; François Rozet
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Surena F Matin; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.862

6.  Open partial nephrectomy in the management of small renal masses.

Authors:  Ziya Kirkali; A Erdem Canda
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.