Literature DB >> 18629504

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: intermediate oncological results.

Stéphane Larré1, Chaker Kanso, Alexandre De La Taille, Andras Hoznek, Dimitrios Vordos, René Yiou, Clément-Claude Abbou, Laurent Salomon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To report the intermediate oncological results of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy by retroperitoneal approach.
METHODS: From 1995 to 2006, 146 consecutive patients with removal of a malignant kidney tumor by laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy were analysed retrospectively. The patients were followed clinically, biologically and radiologically every 6 months. Disease-free survival and specific survival were determined among patients free of metastasis at surgery.
RESULTS: Patient's average age was 61.1 years (25-85). The pathology of these cancers were: 108 clear cell carcinomas, 26 papillary carcinomas, 10 chromophobe carcinomas, and 2 miscellaneous. The T stage were: 105 pT1, 12 pT2, and 29 pT3 (TNM 2002). The Fuhrman grade were: I in 23 cases, II in 70 cases, III in 40 cases, and IV in 9 cases. The surgical margins were positive in 2. No port site recurrence occurred. The average follow-up was 35.4 months (1-137). Five patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Tumor progression was observed among 19 patients, in the form of a local (1) or remote recurrence (18). Fourteen patients died, including 7 because of their tumor. The disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years, were respectively 87.3 and 73.2%, and the cancer-specific survival were 96.2 and 92.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The laparoscopic retroperitoneal radical nephrectomy offers intermediate oncological results compatible with appropriate carcinological efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18629504     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-008-0306-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  22 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients: a single center experience from the United States.

Authors:  I S Gill; A M Meraney; D K Schweizer; S S Savage; M G Hobart; G T Sung; D Nelson; A C Novick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Long-term followup after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Andrew J Portis; Yan Yan; Jaime Landman; Cathy Chen; Peter H Barrett; Donald D Fentie; Yoshinari Ono; Elspeth M McDougall; Ralph V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Current laparoscopic practice patterns in urology: results of a survey among urologists in Germany and Switzerland.

Authors:  Thomas A Vögeli; Martin Burchardt; Paolo Fornara; Jens Rassweiler; Tullio Sulser
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy.

Authors:  P A Clavien; J R Sanabria; S M Strasberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Retroperitoneoscopic versus open surgical radical nephrectomy for large renal cell carcinoma in clinical stage cT2 or cT3a: quality of life, pain and reconvalescence.

Authors:  Wolfgang Dillenburg; Vassilis Poulakis; Konstantinos Skriapas; Rachelle de Vries; Nikolaos Ferakis; Ulrich Witzsch; Michael Melekos; Edward Becht
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience.

Authors:  M D Dunn; A J Portis; A L Shalhav; A M Elbahnasy; C Heidorn; E M McDougall; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria.

Authors:  K H Tsui; O Shvarts; R B Smith; R A Figlin; J B deKernion; A Belldegrun
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prognostic significance of the 1997 TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  J Javidan; H J Stricker; P Tamboli; M B Amin; J O Peabody; A Deshpande; M Menon; M B Amin
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Changing concepts in the surgical management of renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  John S Lam; Oleg Shvarts; Allan J Pantuck
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Application of TNM, 2002 version, in localized renal cell carcinoma: is it able to predict different cancer-specific survival probability?

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Antonio Galfano; Giovanni Novella; Dionisio Schiavone; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of long-term survival in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Jun-Hang Luo; Fang-Jian Zhou; Dan Xie; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Bing Liao; Hong-Wei Zhao; Yu-Ping Dai; Ling-Wu Chen; Wei Chen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Minimally invasive radical nephrectomy: a contemporary review.

Authors:  Akbar N Ashrafi; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.