Literature DB >> 11095500

Mice are not little rats: species differences in a one-day water maze task.

K M Frick1, E T Stillner, J Berger-Sweeney.   

Abstract

The present study examined species differences in spatial and non-spatial memory in the Morris water maze. Male Wistar rats and C57BL/6 mice were tested in a one-day water maze task in which spatial learning, retention, and non-spatial learning were assessed within 3 h. Rats and mice appeared to use different strategies for locating the hidden escape platform. Whereas rats evinced a clear spatial strategy, mice appeared to rely less on spatial cues and more on alternative non-spatial strategies. The sensitivity of this behavioral protocol to subtle species differences highlights the potential use of this one-day water maze task as a tool for evaluating rapidly learning and memory in rodents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11095500     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200011090-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  61 in total

1.  Effects of environmental enrichment on spatial memory and neurochemistry in middle-aged mice.

Authors:  Karyn M Frick; Nancy A Stearns; Jing-Yu Pan; Joanne Berger-Sweeney
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  Pre-exposure to context affects learning strategy selection in mice.

Authors:  Tumay Tunur; Gary P Dohanich; Laura A Schrader
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 2.460

Review 3.  The importance of considering all attributes of memory in behavioral endophenotyping of mouse models of genetic disease.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.912

4.  Axonal ribosomes and mRNAs associate with fragile X granules in adult rodent and human brains.

Authors:  Michael R Akins; Hanna E Berk-Rauch; Kenneth Y Kwan; Molly E Mitchell; Katherine A Shepard; Lulu I T Korsak; Emily E Stackpole; Jennifer L Warner-Schmidt; Nenad Sestan; Heather A Cameron; Justin R Fallon
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Spatial and nonspatial escape strategies in the Barnes maze.

Authors:  Fiona E Harrison; Randall S Reiserer; Andrew J Tomarken; Michael P McDonald
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Hippocampal synaptic plasticity and spatial learning are impaired in a rat model of sleep fragmentation.

Authors:  Jaime L Tartar; Christopher P Ward; James T McKenna; Mahesh Thakkar; Elda Arrigoni; Robert W McCarley; Ritchie E Brown; Robert E Strecker
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Enriched environment prevents cognitive and motor deficits associated with postnatal MK-801 treatment.

Authors:  Masoumeh Nozari; Mohammad Shabani; Mahdieh Hadadi; Nafiseh Atapour
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Characterization of the guinea pig animal model and subsequent comparison of the behavioral effects of selective dopaminergic drugs and methamphetamine.

Authors:  Kiera-Nicole Lee; Samuel T Pellom; Ericka Oliver; Sanika Chirwa
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.562

9.  Progesterone to ovariectomized mice enhances cognitive performance in the spontaneous alternation, object recognition, but not placement, water maze, and contextual and cued conditioned fear tasks.

Authors:  Cheryl A Frye; Alicia A Walf
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  Genetic background differences and nonassociative effects in mouse trace fear conditioning.

Authors:  Dani R Smith; Michela Gallagher; Mark E Stanton
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.