Literature DB >> 11095351

The practices and attitudes of primary care nurse practitioners and physician assistants with respect to colorectal cancer screening.

N J Shaheen1, M A Crosby, M S O'Malley, S C Murray, R S Sandler, J A Galanko, D F Ransohoff, J S Klenzak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although nurse practitioners and physician assistants form a large and growing portion of the primary care workforce, little is known about their colorectal cancer screening practices. The aim of this study was to assess the colorectal cancer screening practices, training, and attitudes of nurse practitioners and physician assistants practicing primary care medicine.
METHODS: All nurse practitioners (827) and physician assistants (1178) licensed by the Medical Board of the State of North Carolina were surveyed by mail. Both groups were further divided into primary care versus non-primary care by self-described roles. Self-reported practices, training, and attitudes with respect to colorectal cancer screening were elicited.
RESULTS: Response rates were 71.4% and 61.2%, for nurse practitioners and physician assistants respectively. A total of 51.3% of nurse practitioners and 50.3% of physician assistants described themselves as adult primary care providers. No primary care nurse practitioners and only 3.8% of primary care physician assistants performed screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. However, 76% of primary care physician assistants and 69% of primary care nurse practitioners reported recommending screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. A total of 95% primary care physician assistants and 92% of primary care nurse practitioners reported performing fecal occult blood testing. Only 9.4% of physician assistants and 2.8% of nurse practitioners received any formal instruction in flexible sigmoidoscopy while in their training. Additionally, 41.4% of primary care physician assistants and 27.7% of primary care nurse practitioners reported that they would be interested in obtaining formal training in flexible sigmoidoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Physician assistants and nurse practitioners are motivated, willing and underutilized groups with respect to CRC screening. Efforts to increase education and training of these professionals may improve the availability of CRC screening modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11095351     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.03262.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  5 in total

1.  Collaborative colorectal cancer screening: a successful quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Joyce Stroud; Chris Felton; Barbara Spreadbury
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2003-07

2.  Knowledge and attitudes of primary health care physicians and nurses with regard to population screening for colorectal cancer in Balearic Islands and Barcelona.

Authors:  Maria Ramos; Magdalena Esteva; Jesús Almeda; Elena Cabeza; Diana Puente; Rosa Saladich; Albert Boada; Maria Llagostera
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

3.  Effectively Communicating Colorectal Cancer Screening Information to Primary Care Providers: Application for State, Tribe or Territory Comprehensive Cancer Control Coalitions.

Authors:  Jennifer Redmond; Robin Vanderpool; Rebecca McClung
Journal:  Am J Health Educ       Date:  2013-01-23

Review 4.  Advanced practice registered nurses, physician assistants and cancer prevention and screening: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alexandria A Smith; Deanna Kepka; K Robin Yabroff
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Identifying quality improvement targets to facilitate colorectal cancer screening completion.

Authors:  Simon J Craddock Lee; Stephen J Inrig; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Celette Sugg Skinner; Robin T Higashi; Katharine McCallister; Wendy Pechero Bishop; Noel O Santini; Jasmin A Tiro
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2018-02-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.