Jennifer Redmond1, Robin Vanderpool2, Rebecca McClung3. 1. Kentucky Cancer Consortium, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40504. 2. Department of Health Behavior, University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, 40504. 3. Institute of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients are more likely to be screened for colorectal cancer if it is recommended by a health care provider. Therefore, it is imperative that providers have access to the latest screening guidelines. PURPOSE: This practice-based project sought to identify Kentucky primary care providers' preferred sources and methods of receiving colorectal cancer information to improve state comprehensive cancer control provider outreach initiatives. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Discussion included preferred sources and methods of receiving updated screening guidelines, legislation, and statewide public awareness campaign materials. RESULTS: Providers (N = 17) identified their preferred methods for receiving colorectal cancer information as: routine emails from trusted sources (colleagues, professional societies and research, and advocacy agencies), scientific journals, existing conferences, and the media. DISCUSSION: When delivering colorectal cancer information to primary care providers, multiple approaches are needed. An ideal partner for dissemination of information is state comprehensive cancer control coalitions, considering their prioritization of colorectal cancer screening and existing networks of partners who were identified as trusted sources. TRANSLATION TO HEALTH EDUCATION PRACTICE: Assessment of primary care providers' preferred methods and sources of receiving colorectal cancer information informs strategies for practice among comprehensive cancer control coalitions.
BACKGROUND:Patients are more likely to be screened for colorectal cancer if it is recommended by a health care provider. Therefore, it is imperative that providers have access to the latest screening guidelines. PURPOSE: This practice-based project sought to identify Kentucky primary care providers' preferred sources and methods of receiving colorectal cancer information to improve state comprehensive cancer control provider outreach initiatives. METHODS: Four focus groups were conducted with primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. Discussion included preferred sources and methods of receiving updated screening guidelines, legislation, and statewide public awareness campaign materials. RESULTS: Providers (N = 17) identified their preferred methods for receiving colorectal cancer information as: routine emails from trusted sources (colleagues, professional societies and research, and advocacy agencies), scientific journals, existing conferences, and the media. DISCUSSION: When delivering colorectal cancer information to primary care providers, multiple approaches are needed. An ideal partner for dissemination of information is state comprehensive cancer control coalitions, considering their prioritization of colorectal cancer screening and existing networks of partners who were identified as trusted sources. TRANSLATION TO HEALTH EDUCATION PRACTICE: Assessment of primary care providers' preferred methods and sources of receiving colorectal cancer information informs strategies for practice among comprehensive cancer control coalitions.
Authors: Carrie N Klabunde; Sally W Vernon; Marion R Nadel; Nancy Breen; Laura C Seeff; Martin L Brown Journal: Med Care Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Debra J Holden; Daniel E Jonas; Deborah S Porterfield; Daniel Reuland; Russell Harris Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kimberly M Kelly; Clarenda M Phillips; Crystal Jenkins; Gretchen Norling; Carol White; Todd Jenkins; Debra Armstrong; Joe Petrik; Amy Steinkuhl; Regina Washington; Mark Dignan Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Douglas K Rex; David A Johnson; Joseph C Anderson; Phillip S Schoenfeld; Carol A Burke; John M Inadomi Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-02-24 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Bernard Levin; David A Lieberman; Beth McFarland; Robert A Smith; Durado Brooks; Kimberly S Andrews; Chiranjeev Dash; Francis M Giardiello; Seth Glick; Theodore R Levin; Perry Pickhardt; Douglas K Rex; Alan Thorson; Sidney J Winawer Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2008-03-05 Impact factor: 508.702