Literature DB >> 11094588

Rapacuronium 2.0 or 2.5 mg kg-1 for rapid-sequence induction: comparison with succinylcholine 1.0 mg kg-1.

M Blobner1, R K Mirakhur, J M Wierda, P M Wright, K T Olkkola, B Debaene, P Pendeville, J Engbaek, H Rietbergen, H J Sparr.   

Abstract

The purpose of this nine-centre study in 602 patients was to show that the frequency of acceptable intubating conditions after rapacuronium 2.0 or 2.5 mg kg-1 is not more than 10% lower than the frequency after succinylcholine 1.0 mg kg-1 during rapid-sequence induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl 1-2 micrograms kg-1 and thiopental 2-7 mg kg-1. Laryngoscopy and intubation were carried out 60 s after administration of muscle relaxant by an anaesthetist blinded to its identity. Intubating conditions were clinically acceptable (excellent or good) in 91.8% of patients given succinylcholine and in 84.1 and 87.6% of patients given rapacuronium 2.0 and 2.5 mg kg-1 respectively. With respect to the percentage of clinically acceptable intubating conditions, the estimated difference (and the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval) between succinylcholine and rapacuronium 2.0 mg kg-1 was 7.8 (14.4)% and between succinylcholine and rapacuronium 2.5 mg kg-1 it was 4.0 (10.2)%. For both comparisons, the upper limit of the one-sided confidence interval exceeded the predefined 10% difference. Hence, it could not be demonstrated that the intubating conditions with either of the two doses of rapacuronium were not inferior to those with succinylcholine 1.0 mg kg-1. The increase in heart rate was significantly greater during the first 5 min in the rapacuronium groups, but the arterial pressure increased significantly only in the succinylcholine group (P < 0.001). Respiratory side-effects were observed in 4.0, 13.5 and 18.5% of patients after succinylcholine and rapacuronium 2.0 and 2.5 mg kg-1 respectively (P < 0.05). As the non-inferiority of intubating conditions after rapacuronium 2.0 and 2.5 mg kg-1 could not be proven, succinylcholine should be considered the neuromuscular blocking agent that provides better intubating conditions for rapid-sequence induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11094588     DOI: 10.1093/bja/85.5.724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  3 in total

Review 1.  Newer neuromuscular blocking agents: how do they compare with established agents?

Authors:  H J Sparr; T M Beaufort; T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapacuronium bromide.

Authors:  William J Wight; Peter M C Wright
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  The optimal succinylcholine dose for intubating emergency patients: retrospective comparative study.

Authors:  Alaa Ezzat; Essam Fathi; Ahmad Zarour; Rajvir Singh; M Osama Abusaeda; M Magdy Hussien
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 1.657

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.