P Angerer1, W Kothny, S Störk, C von Schacky. 1. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum der Universität München--Innenstadt, Germany. pangerer@medinn.med.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to clarify in a randomized, controlled, observer-blind trial whether hormone replacement therapy (HRT) improves elastic properties of the common carotid artery in women with signs of subclinical atherosclerosis, especially in subgroups with increased risk, and whether less progestin enhances the effect. BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies have yielded conflicting results on the influence of HRT on central arteries. Some studies reported improvement of distensibility by estrogen alone or in the subgroup of smokers. METHODS: A total of 321 postmenopausal women were randomized to 1 mg 17beta-estradiol plus 0.025 mg gestodene for 12 days every month (HRT 1), or 1 mg 17beta-estradiol plus 0.025 mg gestodene for 12 days every third month (HRT 2), or no-HRT, during 48 weeks. In 173 women, distensibility of the common carotid artery was determined before and after therapy by M-mode ultrasound and brachial blood pressure measurement. RESULTS:Change of distensibility was small and similar in the three treatment groups. In the subgroup of current smokers, HRT 2 (low progestin) increased distensibility by 32% (HRT 2: 8.2+/-11.7; HRT 1:0.6+/-6.0; no HRT: -1.8+/-6.8 x 10(-3)/kPa, p = 0.025 for no-HRT vs. HRT 2). In the subgroups with elevated blood pressure, high low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high age, no effect of HRT was detected. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized intervention study demonstrates that long-term HRT with estrogen and progestin does not substantially influence distensibility of central arteries. Yet, in currently smoking postmenopausal women, HRT with low progestin seems to improve distensibility; this merits further study in a specifically designed trial.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to clarify in a randomized, controlled, observer-blind trial whether hormone replacement therapy (HRT) improves elastic properties of the common carotid artery in women with signs of subclinical atherosclerosis, especially in subgroups with increased risk, and whether less progestin enhances the effect. BACKGROUND: Previous observational studies have yielded conflicting results on the influence of HRT on central arteries. Some studies reported improvement of distensibility by estrogen alone or in the subgroup of smokers. METHODS: A total of 321 postmenopausal women were randomized to 1 mg 17beta-estradiol plus 0.025 mg gestodene for 12 days every month (HRT 1), or 1 mg 17beta-estradiol plus 0.025 mg gestodene for 12 days every third month (HRT 2), or no-HRT, during 48 weeks. In 173 women, distensibility of the common carotid artery was determined before and after therapy by M-mode ultrasound and brachial blood pressure measurement. RESULTS: Change of distensibility was small and similar in the three treatment groups. In the subgroup of current smokers, HRT 2 (low progestin) increased distensibility by 32% (HRT 2: 8.2+/-11.7; HRT 1:0.6+/-6.0; no HRT: -1.8+/-6.8 x 10(-3)/kPa, p = 0.025 for no-HRT vs. HRT 2). In the subgroups with elevated blood pressure, high low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, or high age, no effect of HRT was detected. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized intervention study demonstrates that long-term HRT with estrogen and progestin does not substantially influence distensibility of central arteries. Yet, in currently smoking postmenopausal women, HRT with low progestin seems to improve distensibility; this merits further study in a specifically designed trial.
Authors: N Tentolouris; G Christodoulakos; I Lambrinoudaki; E Mandalaki; C Panoulis; C Maridaki; G Creatsas; N Katsilambros Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Wulf H Utian; David F Archer; Gloria A Bachmann; Christopher Gallagher; Francine n Grodstein; Julia R Heiman; Victor W Henderson; Howard N Hodis; Richard H Karas; Rogerio A Lobo; JoAnn E Manson; Robert L Reid; Peter J Schmidt; Cynthia A Stuenkel Journal: Menopause Date: 2008 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Daichi Shimbo; Lu Wang; Michael J Lamonte; Matthew Allison; Gregory A Wellenius; Anthony A Bavry; Lisa W Martin; Aaron Aragaki; Jonathan D Newman; Yael Swica; Jacques E Rossouw; JoAnn E Manson; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller Journal: J Hypertens Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 4.844
Authors: Shelley R Salpeter; Judith M E Walsh; Elizabeth Greyber; Thomas M Ormiston; Edwin E Salpeter Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Peter Willeit; Lena Tschiderer; Michael J Sweeting; Simon G Thompson; Matthias W Lorenz; Elias Allara; Kathrin Reuber; Lisa Seekircher; Lu Gao; Ximing Liao; Eva Lonn; Hertzel C Gerstein; Salim Yusuf; Frank P Brouwers; Folkert W Asselbergs; Wiek van Gilst; Sigmund A Anderssen; Diederick E Grobbee; John J P Kastelein; Frank L J Visseren; George Ntaios; Apostolos I Hatzitolios; Christos Savopoulos; Pythia T Nieuwkerk; Erik Stroes; Matthew Walters; Peter Higgins; Jesse Dawson; Paolo Gresele; Giuseppe Guglielmini; Rino Migliacci; Marat Ezhov; Maya Safarova; Tatyana Balakhonova; Eiichi Sato; Mayuko Amaha; Tsukasa Nakamura; Kostas Kapellas; Lisa M Jamieson; Michael Skilton; James A Blumenthal; Alan Hinderliter; Andrew Sherwood; Patrick J Smith; Michiel A van Agtmael; Peter Reiss; Marit G A van Vonderen; Stefan Kiechl; Gerhard Klingenschmid; Matthias Sitzer; Coen D A Stehouwer; Heiko Uthoff; Zhi-Yong Zou; Ana R Cunha; Mario F Neves; Miles D Witham; Hyun-Woong Park; Moo-Sik Lee; Jang-Ho Bae; Enrique Bernal; Kristian Wachtell; Sverre E Kjeldsen; Michael H Olsen; David Preiss; Naveed Sattar; Edith Beishuizen; Menno V Huisman; Mark A Espeland; Caroline Schmidt; Stefan Agewall; Ercan Ok; Gülay Aşçi; Eric de Groot; Muriel P C Grooteman; Peter J Blankestijn; Michiel L Bots Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 29.690