Literature DB >> 11092623

Anaerobic bioconversion of cellulose by Ruminococcus albus, Methanobrevibacter smithii, and Methanosarcina barkeri.

T L Miller1, E Currenti, M J Wolin.   

Abstract

A system is described that combines the fermentation of cellulose to acetate, CH4, and CO2 by Ruminococcus albus and Methanobrevibacter smithii with the fermentation of acetate to CH4 and CO2 by Methanosarcina barkeri to convert cellulose to CH4 and CO2. A cellulose-containing medium was pumped into a co-culture of the cellulolytic R. albus and the H2-using methanogen, Mb. smithii. The effluent was fed into a holding reservoir, adjusted to pH 4.5, and then pumped into a culture of Ms. barkeri maintained at constant volume by pumping out culture contents. Fermentation of 1% cellulose to CH4 and CO2 was accomplished during 132 days of operation with retention times (RTs) of the Ms. barkeri culture of 7.5-3.8 days. Rates of acetate utilization were 9.5-17.3 mmol l(-1) day(-1) and increased with decreasing RT. The Ks for acetate utilization was 6-8 mM. The two-stage system can be used as a model system for studying biological and physical parameters that influence the bioconversion process. Our results suggest that manipulating the different phases of cellulose fermentation separately can effectively balance the pH and ionic requirements of the acid-producing phase with the acid-using phase of the overall fermentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11092623     DOI: 10.1007/s002530000430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

Review 1.  Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology.

Authors:  Lee R Lynd; Paul J Weimer; Willem H van Zyl; Isak S Pretorius
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 11.056

2.  Comparative analysis of gut microbiota in healthy and diarrheic yaks.

Authors:  JunJun Liu; Xin Wang; Wenqian Zhang; Muhammad Fakhar-E-Alam Kulyar; Kalim Ullah; Zhaoqing Han; Jianhua Qin; Chongliang Bi; Yaping Wang; Kun Li
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 6.352

3.  Integrated Bacteria-Fungi Diversity Analysis Reveals the Gut Microbial Changes in Buffalo With Mastitis.

Authors:  Xiushuang Chen; Miao An; Wenqian Zhang; Kun Li; Muhammad Fakhar-E-Alam Kulyar; Kun Duan; Hui Zhou; Yu Wu; Xin Wan; Jianlong Li; Lingtong Quan; Zhanhai Mai; Wenxia Bai; Yi Wu
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Comparative Analysis of Gut Microbiota Between Healthy and Diarrheic Horses.

Authors:  Yaonan Li; Yanfang Lan; Shuang Zhang; Xiaoli Wang
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

5.  Decreased Methane Emissions Associated with Methanogenic and Methanotrophic Communities in a Pig Manure Windrow Composting System under Calcium Superphosphate Amendment.

Authors:  Yihe Zhang; Mengyuan Huang; Fengwei Zheng; Shumin Guo; Xiuchao Song; Shuwei Liu; Shuqing Li; Jianwen Zou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  Microbial ecology of anaerobic digesters: the key players of anaerobiosis.

Authors:  Fayyaz Ali Shah; Qaisar Mahmood; Mohammad Maroof Shah; Arshid Pervez; Saeed Ahmad Asad
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-02-19

7.  Potency of cashew nut shell liquid in rumen modulation under different dietary conditions and indication of its surfactant action against rumen bacteria.

Authors:  Seongjin Oh; Yasuyuki Suzuki; Shusuke Hayashi; Yutaka Suzuki; Satoshi Koike; Yasuo Kobayashi
Journal:  J Anim Sci Technol       Date:  2017-11-24

8.  Effects of Hydrolysable Tannin with or without Condensed Tannin on Alfalfa Silage Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Ruminal Methane Production, Fermentation Patterns, and Microbiota.

Authors:  Lei Chen; Xueyan Bao; Gang Guo; Wenjie Huo; Qingfang Xu; Cong Wang; Qinghong Li; Qiang Liu
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.752

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.