Literature DB >> 11091942

Age differences in false recognition using a forced choice paradigm.

D J LaVoie1, K Faulkner.   

Abstract

Recent findings suggest that older adults may be more susceptible to false recognition responses than younger adults because of age differences in gist-based processing at both encoding and retrieval. It has been suggested that age differences in the quality of memory representations that result from this age-related reliance on gist processing can produce age differences in response criteria, with older adults employing more lenient criteria than young adults. Support for this argument comes from studies where suppressed false recognition in older adults occurs with shifts toward more conservative response criteria. The current study further examined this issue by minimizing the effects of response criteria by using a two alternative forced-choice task in the study of false recognition in young and older adults. This manipulation reduced false recognition in both young and older adults, but did not eliminate age differences in false recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11091942     DOI: 10.1080/036107300750015750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Aging Res        ISSN: 0361-073X            Impact factor:   1.645


  4 in total

1.  Eyewitness recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults.

Authors:  Amina Memon; Lorraine Hope; James Bartlett; Ray Bull
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

2.  An individual difference analysis of false recognition.

Authors:  Timothy A Salthouse; Karen L Siedlecki
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  2007

3.  Now you make false memories; now you do not: the order of presentation of words in DRM lists influences the production of the critical lure in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Christelle Evrard; Anne-Laure Gilet; Fabienne Colombel; Elodie Dufermont; Yves Corson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-12-03

4.  Age-related differences in brain activity during true and false memory retrieval.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Hongkeun Kim; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.225

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.