Literature DB >> 11090886

Lesions of nucleus accumbens reduce instrumental but not consummatory negative contrast in rats.

M H Leszczuk1, C F Flaherty.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1, rats provided with brief daily access to 4% sucrose which preceded brief access to 32% sucrose (4-32) suppressed licking the 4% solution relative to 4-4 controls. This anticipatory negative contrast (ANC) was diminished when the 32% solution was downshifted to 4%. Licking the second 4% solution in shifted rats (4-32-4) was lower than licking of the second 4% solution in 4-4 control rats - a successive negative contrast (SNC) effect. Neither SNC nor ANC or their recovery were influenced by electrolytic lesions of the nucleus accumbens (NAC). Latency to initiate licking followed a concentration function, with rats initiating licking faster for 32 than 4% sucrose, but was not affected by the lesion. In Experiment 2, rats showed clear SNC in consummatory behavior when shifted from 32 to 4% sucrose and also showed SNC in running speed when shifted from a 12- to 1-pellet reward in a straight runway. As in Experiment 1, consummatory SNC was not affected by the lesion. However, in the runway, lesioned animals showed contrast later (after more trials) than the sham-lesioned rats and did not show contrast in the goal section, when goal speed was averaged across the postshift period. Reward downshift also increased the animals' tendency to backtrack in the runway and backtracking was greater in the lesioned rats during both the preshift and postshift periods. These data suggest that the NAC is not a necessary structure for the generation of expectancies, the comparison of rewards or the modulation of ingestive behavior. However, the NAC may be involved in responding to unmet expectancies when the task involves approach or instrumental behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11090886     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(00)00265-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Emotion and relative reward processing: an investigation on instrumental successive negative contrast and ultrasonic vocalizations in the rat.

Authors:  K A Binkley; E S Webber; D D Powers; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Relative reward processing in primate striatum.

Authors:  Howard C Cromwell; Oum K Hassani; Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Relative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects.

Authors:  E S Webber; N E Chambers; J A Kostek; D E Mankin; H C Cromwell
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Chemosensory processing in the taste - reward pathway.

Authors:  Ranier Gutierrez; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.576

5.  Bilateral lesions of the thalamic trigeminal orosensory area dissociate natural from drug reward in contrast paradigms.

Authors:  Jennifer E Nyland; Danielle N Alexander; Nu-Chu Liang; Patricia S Grigson
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Aversive properties of negative incentive shifts in Fischer 344 and Lewis rats.

Authors:  Adam Brewer; Patrick Johnson; Jeff Stein; Michael Schlund; Dean C Williams
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Sex-dependent impacts of low-level lead exposure and prenatal stress on impulsive choice behavior and associated biochemical and neurochemical manifestations.

Authors:  Hiromi I Weston; Douglas D Weston; Joshua L Allen; Deborah A Cory-Slechta
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 4.294

Review 8.  Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data.

Authors:  Wolfram Schultz
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 37.312

9.  Incentive or habit learning in amphibians?

Authors:  Rubén N Muzio; Virginia Pistone Creydt; Mariana Iurman; Mauro A Rinaldi; Bruno Sirani; Mauricio R Papini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Striatal Activity and Reward Relativity: Neural Signals Encoding Dynamic Outcome Valuation.

Authors:  Emily S Webber; David E Mankin; Howard C Cromwell
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.