Literature DB >> 11089991

Optimized speech understanding with the continuous interleaved sampling speech coding strategy in patients with cochlear implants: effect of variations in stimulation rate and number of channels.

J Kiefer1, C von Ilberg, V Rupprecht, J Hubner-Egner, R Knecht.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of systematic variations in stimulation rate and number of channels on speech understanding in 13 patients with cochlear implants who used the continuous interleaved sampling speech coding strategy. Reducing the stimulation rate from 1,515 to 1,730 pulses per second per channel to 600 pulses per second per channel resulted in decreased overall performance; the understanding of monosyllables and consonants was more affected than the understanding of vowels. Reducing the number of active channels below 7 or 8 channels decreased speech understanding; the identification of vowels and monosyllables was most affected. We conclude that vowel recognition with the continuous interleaved sampling strategy relies on spectral cues more than on temporal cues, increasing with the number of active channels, whereas consonant recognition is more dependent on temporal cues and stimulation rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11089991     DOI: 10.1177/000348940010901105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  21 in total

1.  A point process framework for modeling electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Joshua H Goldwyn; Jay T Rubinstein; Eric Shea-Brown
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effect of stimulation rate on cochlear implant users' phoneme, word and sentence recognition in quiet and in noise.

Authors:  Robert V Shannon; Rachel J Cruz; John J Galvin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 1.854

3.  Using temporal modulation sensitivity to select stimulation sites for processor MAPs in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 4.  Temporal Considerations for Stimulating Spiral Ganglion Neurons with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Jason Boulet; Mark White; Ian C Bruce
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02

5.  Effect of stimulus level on the temporal response properties of the auditory nerve in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Sarah A Laurello
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  The effect of presentation level and stimulation rate on speech perception and modulation detection for cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Tim Brochier; Hugh J McDermott; Colette M McKay
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Weighting of Acoustic Cues to a Manner Distinction by Children With and Without Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Within-subjects comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 speech processing strategies: speech perception and its relation to place-pitch sensitivity.

Authors:  Gail S Donaldson; Patricia K Dawson; Lamar Z Borden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future.

Authors:  Blake S Wilson; Michael F Dorman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.