Literature DB >> 11089583

Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection: early postoperative results of a prospective study involving 116 patients. The Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group.

F Köckerling1, H Scheidbach, C Schneider, E Bärlehner, L Köhler, H P Bruch, J Konradt, C Wittekind, W Hohenberger.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Although laparoscopic colorectal surgery is attracting ever more attention, its use for curative treatment of colorectal carcinoma in particular continues to be controversial. The present study was an attempt to analyze the results of the perioperative course, oncologic quality, and preliminary long-term results.
METHOD: The data considered here were collected within the framework of a prospective, observational study initiated on August 1, 1995, and involving a total of 18 institutions in Germany and Austria. At the end of three years, the results are now being presented selectively, i.e., focusing only on abdominoperineal resection.
RESULTS: A total of 116 patients underwent laparoscopic abdominoperineal resections, 98 (84.5 percent) of which were performed with curative intent. The mean operating time was 226 (confidence interval, 140-365) minutes. Seven patients (6 percent) experienced an intraoperative complication, which in more than one-half of the cases was a vascular injury involving the presacral venous plexus; the conversion rate was 3.4 percent. Postoperatively, 40 patients developed 97 complications--including those of a very minor nature--giving an overall morbidity rate of 34.4 percent. Reoperation in six patients (5.2 percent) had to be performed for an afterbleed in one-half of the cases and ileus in the other one-half. Postoperative mortality was a low 1.7 percent. In most of the curative resections, an oncologically radical operation with high transection of the inferior mesenteric artery and a complete dissection of the pelvis down to the floor was performed. The median number of lymph nodes investigated was 11.5, and there was wide fluctuation in the numbers among the individual institutions. Tumor cell dissemination occurred intraoperatively in five patients. In the meantime, 79 patients (81 percent) underwent at least one follow-up examination, the mean follow-up period being 491 days. Seven patients developed a local recurrence, and a further six patients developed distant metastases. For recurrence-free survival rate, the Kaplan-Meier estimation calculated a probability of 71 percent.
CONCLUSION: Not all of the reservations about laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection, in particular with regard to resection with curative intent, have yet been eliminated. The present study does, however, show that a laparoscopic approach can in principle meet oncologic requirements of radicality and, with regard to the postoperative course, is associated with considerable benefits to the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11089583     DOI: 10.1007/BF02236728

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

Review 1.  Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  E H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Laparoscopy for rectal cancer: the need for randomized trials.

Authors:  Thomas E Read; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-02

3.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: The state of the art.

Authors:  Carlo Staudacher; Andrea Vignali
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-27

4.  Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Min-Hua Zheng; Bo Feng; Ai-Guo Lu; Jian-Wen Li; Ming-Liang Wang; Zhi-Hai Mao; Yan-Yan Hu; Feng Dong; Wei-Guo Hu; Dong-Hua Li; Lu Zang; Yuan-Fei Peng; Bao-Ming Yu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: oncological results and clinical outcome of 225 patients.

Authors:  Ayman Agha; Alois Fürst; Johanna Hierl; Igors Iesalnieks; Gabriel Glockzin; Matthias Anthuber; Karl-Walter Jauch; Hans J Schlitt
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Initial surgical experience in laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for middle and lower third rectal cancer: short-term results.

Authors:  José M Fernández-Cebrián; Pablo Gil; Pilar Hernández-Granados; Carmen Fiuza; Federico Ochando; Carmelo Loinaz; José Antonio Rueda; Manuel Lasala; Pedro Jiménez-Almonacid; Daniel Vega; Mar Pardo; Antonio Quintans
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Long-term results of laparoscopy-assisted radical right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy: clinical analysis with 177 cases.

Authors:  Ding-Pei Han; Ai-Guo Lu; Hao Feng; Pu-Xiong-Zhi Wang; Qi-Feng Cao; Ya-Ping Zong; Bo Feng; Min-Hua Zheng
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Modifiable surgical and anesthesiologic risk factors for the development of cardiac and pulmonary complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Th C Böttger; S Hermeneit; M Müller; A Terzic; A Rodehorst; L Elad; M Schamberger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A study evaluating the safety of laparoscopic radical operation for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Min-Hua Zheng; Ai-Guo Lu; Bo Feng; Yan-Yan Hu; Jian-Wen Li; Ming-Liang Wang; Feng Dong; Jing-Li Cai; Yu Jiang
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer: is the pelvic drain externalization site an independent risk factor for perineal wound healing?

Authors:  M G Pramateftakis; D Raptis; D Kanellos; E Christoforidis; G Tsoulfas; I Kanellos; Ch Lazaridis
Journal:  Int J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.