T B Birmingham1. 1. Elborn College, School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. tbirming@julian.uwo.ca
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate the test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional instability measures involving testing situations of varying complexity, and 2) To evaluate the interrelationships among performances observed during these tests and a maximal single-limb forward hop for distance. DESIGN: A repeated measures design, repeated on two occasions. SETTING: Postural control laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty young healthy subjects (23.5 +/- 2.0 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects performed single-limb standing balance and forward hop tests on two occasions completed within 1 week and at least 24 hours apart. Standing balance was assessed using a force platform and the following four progressively complex test situations: 1) standing on the stable platform with eyes open, 2) standing on a foam mat placed over the platform with eyes open, 3) standing on the stable platform with eyes closed, and 4) standing on the stable platform after landing from a maximal single-limb forward hop. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Intraclass correlation coefficients were moderate to excellent (0.41 to 0.91) suggesting that the standing balance tests are appropriate for distinguishing among group performances. Standard errors of measurement and associated 95% confidence intervals suggested that a change in an individual's standing balance performance of approximately 10-30% would be necessary in order to confidently state that a true change had occurred. Stronger relationships were observed between hop distance and standing balance tests performed with eyes closed (r = -0.63, p < 0.001) and after landing from a maximal hop (r = -0.53, p = 0.003), suggesting that tests that challenge postural control to a greater extent are more representative of functional performance.
OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate the test-retest reliability of lower extremity functional instability measures involving testing situations of varying complexity, and 2) To evaluate the interrelationships among performances observed during these tests and a maximal single-limb forward hop for distance. DESIGN: A repeated measures design, repeated on two occasions. SETTING: Postural control laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty young healthy subjects (23.5 +/- 2.0 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjects performed single-limb standing balance and forward hop tests on two occasions completed within 1 week and at least 24 hours apart. Standing balance was assessed using a force platform and the following four progressively complex test situations: 1) standing on the stable platform with eyes open, 2) standing on a foam mat placed over the platform with eyes open, 3) standing on the stable platform with eyes closed, and 4) standing on the stable platform after landing from a maximal single-limb forward hop. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Intraclass correlation coefficients were moderate to excellent (0.41 to 0.91) suggesting that the standing balance tests are appropriate for distinguishing among group performances. Standard errors of measurement and associated 95% confidence intervals suggested that a change in an individual's standing balance performance of approximately 10-30% would be necessary in order to confidently state that a true change had occurred. Stronger relationships were observed between hop distance and standing balance tests performed with eyes closed (r = -0.63, p < 0.001) and after landing from a maximal hop (r = -0.53, p = 0.003), suggesting that tests that challenge postural control to a greater extent are more representative of functional performance.
Authors: Maria I Ventura; Deborah E Barnes; Jessica M Ross; Kimberly E Lanni; Karen A Sigvardt; Elizabeth A Disbrow Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2016-10-17 Impact factor: 2.226