Literature DB >> 16738867

Static and dynamic standing balance: test-retest reliability and reference values in 9 to 10 year old children.

Elisabeth Geldhof1, Greet Cardon, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Lieven Danneels, Pascal Coorevits, Guy Vanderstraeten, Dirk De Clercq.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Based on the literature, reliability reports and normative data for bilateral stance assessments in elementary schoolchildren are limited. The present study was designed to report test-retest reliability and reference values for postural stability in 9 to 10 years old schoolchildren using the Balance Master system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty children participated in the reproducibility study (mean age 10.1+/-0.7) including test and retest measurement with a one-week interval. The modified clinical test of sensory interaction on balance (mCTSIB) quantified children's static standing balance. The test for the limits of stability (LOS) measured dynamic standing balance. The study sample to determine reference values consisted of 99 children (mean age 9.8+/0.5).
RESULTS: The ICCs for inter-item reliability of the four sensory conditions of the mCTSIB showed fair to excellent reliability (ICCs between 0.62 and 0.80). The reproducibility between test and retest was non-significant for the condition 'firm surface with eyes closed' (ICC of 0.37), fair to good for the three other sensory conditions (ICCs between 0.59 and 0.68), and excellent for the composite sway velocity (ICC of 0.77). For all LOS parameters, the significant ICCs showed fair to good reproducibility (ICCs between 0.44 and 0.62), with the exception of the non-significant ICC for the composite reaction time. The ICCs for the separate LOS parameters showed fair to good and excellent reliability for nine parameters (ICCs between 0.46 and 0.81), while 11 separate LOS scores did not demonstrate significant ICCs. DISCUSSION: Analysing reference values, girls performed better on all the composite balance parameters compared to boys, with the exception of reaction time and movement velocity. No differences were found on standing balance scores between 9 and 10 year olds.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, the Balance Master showed fair to good reliability for most postural parameters in 9 to 10 year olds. The current data on postural control in children aged 9 to 10 years are relevant for research in other domains within the clinical field, like obesitas and developmental coordination disorder or in relation to back pain prevalence at early age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16738867     DOI: 10.1007/s00431-006-0173-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  18 in total

1.  What is balance?

Authors:  A S Pollock; B R Durward; P J Rowe; J P Paul
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.477

2.  Perceptual-motor contributions to static and dynamic balance control in children.

Authors:  V Hatzitaki; V Zisi; Il Kollias; E Kioumourtzoglou
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Development of a clinical static and dynamic standing balance measurement tool appropriate for use in adolescents.

Authors:  Carolyn A Emery; J David Cassidy; Terry P Klassen; Rhonda J Rosychuk; Brian B Rowe
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-06

4.  Assessment of static balance in children.

Authors:  F Figura; G Cama; L Capranica; L Guidetti; C Pulejo
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Normal variability of postural measures: implications for the reliability of relative balance performance outcomes.

Authors:  B Brouwer; E G Culham; R A Liston; T Grant
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1998-09

6.  Balance control: sex and age differences in 9- to 16-year-olds.

Authors:  Lee Nolan; Anatoli Grigorenko; Alf Thorstensson
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.449

7.  Developmental changes of static standing balance in children.

Authors:  Christina Rival; Hadrien Ceyte; Isabelle Olivier
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Intrasession reliability of center of pressure measures of postural steadiness in healthy elderly people.

Authors:  Danik Lafond; Hélène Corriveau; Réjean Hébert; François Prince
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  The development of postural strategies in children: a factorial design study.

Authors:  Maurizio Schmid; Silvia Conforto; Luisa Lopez; Paolo Renzi; Tommaso D'Alessio
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-09-30       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Reliability of upright posture measurements in primary school children.

Authors:  Maureen P McEvoy; Karen Grimmer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  30 in total

1.  Feasibility and reliability of dynamic postural control measures in children in first through fifth grades.

Authors:  Avery D Faigenbaum; Gregory D Myer; Ismael Perez Fernandez; Eduardo Gomez Carrasco; Nathaniel Bates; Anne Farrell; Nicholas A Ratamess; Jie Kang
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04

2.  Postural Control and Head Impact Exposure in Youth Football Players: Comparison of the Balance Error Scoring System and a Force Plate Protocol.

Authors:  Eamon T Campolettano; Gunnar Brolinson; Steven Rowson
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 1.833

3.  Virtual reality training improves dynamic balance in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Morteza Pourazar; Fazlolah Bagherzadeh; Fatemeh Mirakhori
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-10-26

4.  Reliability of postural control measures in children and young adolescents.

Authors:  Stefania Barozzi; Marina Socci; Daniela Soi; Federica Di Berardino; Giovanni Fabio; Stella Forti; Anna M Gasbarre; Daniele Brambilla; Antonio Cesarani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Physical activity and obesity: biomechanical and physiological key concepts.

Authors:  Julie Nantel; Marie-Eve Mathieu; François Prince
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2010-11-22

6.  INTERRATER AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE Y BALANCE TEST IN HEALTHY, EARLY ADOLESCENT FEMALE ATHLETES.

Authors:  Eric T Greenberg; Matthew Barle; Erica Glassmann; Min-Kyung Jung
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04

7.  POSTURAL STABILITY AND KINETIC CHANGE IN SUBJECTS WITH PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN AFTER A NINE-WEEK HIP AND CORE STRENGTHENING INTERVENTION.

Authors:  Patrick M Carry; Raj Gala; Kate Worster; Susan Kanai; Nancy H Miller; David James; Aaron J Provance; James J Carollo
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-06

8.  RELIABILITY OF CENTER OF PRESSURE-BASED MEASURES DURING DUAL-TASK POSTURAL CONTROL TESTING IN A YOUTH POPULATION.

Authors:  Eamon T Campolettano; Michael L Madigan; Steven Rowson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-12

9.  Prenatal alcohol exposure and childhood balance ability: findings from a UK birth cohort study.

Authors:  Rachel Humphriss; Amanda Hall; Margaret May; Luisa Zuccolo; John Macleod
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Test-retest reliability of measurements of the center of pressure displacement in quiet standing and during maximal voluntary body leaning among healthy elderly men.

Authors:  Stemplewski Rafał; Maciaszek Janusz; Osiński Wiesław; Szeklicki Robert
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 2.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.