Literature DB >> 11085345

Antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome associated with prostate cancer therapies: incidence and clinical significance.

R Paul1, J Breul.   

Abstract

The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome is a well established phenomenon in prostate cancer. It is widely accepted that a subset of patients will benefit from the withdrawal of antiandrogen or steroidal hormone from hormonal therapy, exhibiting decreasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values and clinical improvement. The pathophysiology of antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome is not completely understood, although androgen receptor gene mutations seem to be the likely explanation. Currently, it is not possible to identify the subset of patients whose tumours will respond to antiandrogen or steroid withdrawal. Tumours that will respond may be classified as androgen-independent and hormone-sensitive tumours as opposed to androgen-independent and hormone-insensitive tumours that do not respond. Patients who respond to antiandrogen withdrawal experience approximately 6 months with improved quality of life; however, it is unknown if this translates into prolonged survival. At the very least, antiandrogen withdrawal offers a therapeutic modality that is not associated with adverse effects and improves quality of life even if only for a very limited time. Recent reports suggest that adding a secondary hormonal therapy such as amino- glutethimide, ketoconazole or steroidal hormones may enhance the response rate and prolong response time to the antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. However, unless there is proof that this secondary hormonal manipulation prolongs survival, maintenance of quality of life is mandatory because of the possible adverse effects from these potent drugs. The fact that about 30% of patients will respond to antiandrogen or steroid withdrawal in hormone refractory prostate cancer must be taken into account in clinical trials of new cytotoxic agents which have been and will be conducted. Cessation of flutamide for at least 4 weeks and, in the case of bicalutamide, even 8 weeks, is mandatory before antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome can be excluded as the cause of decreasing PSA values. The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome offers another piece of the puzzle of prostatic carcinoma, but at the same time it demonstrates how different advanced prostate cancer cells may react to therapeutic strategies and, therefore, hormone refractory prostate cancer remains a difficult challenge which must be solved in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11085345     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200023050-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  49 in total

1.  The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome. Experience in a large cohort of unselected patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  E J Small; S Srinivas
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Flutamide withdrawal plus hydrocortisone resulted in clinical complete response in a patient with prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  W D Figg; G Kroog; P Duray; M M Walther; N Patronas; O Sartor; E Reed
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  [The antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome: decrease in prostate specific antigen serum levels after withdrawal of antiandrogens].

Authors:  M Hornák; A Bárdos; F Goncalves
Journal:  Rozhl Chir       Date:  1997-09

4.  Steroid hormone withdrawal syndromes. Pathophysiology and clinical significance.

Authors:  W K Kelly; S Slovin; H I Scher
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.241

5.  Prostate specific antigen decreases after withdrawal of antiandrogen therapy with bicalutamide or flutamide in patients receiving combined androgen blockade.

Authors:  P F Schellhammer; P Venner; G P Haas; E J Small; P T Nieh; D R Seabaugh; A L Patterson; E Klein; Z Wajsman; B Furr; Y Chen; G J Kolvenbag
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Surprising activity of flutamide withdrawal, when combined with aminoglutethimide, in treatment of "hormone-refractory" prostate cancer.

Authors:  O Sartor; M Cooper; M Weinberger; D Headlee; A Thibault; A Tompkins; S Steinberg; W D Figg; W M Linehan; C E Myers
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1994-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome with cyproterone acetate.

Authors:  A Sella; D Flex; A Sulkes; J Baniel
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Mutant androgen receptor detected in an advanced-stage prostatic carcinoma is activated by adrenal androgens and progesterone.

Authors:  Z Culig; A Hobisch; M V Cronauer; A C Cato; A Hittmair; C Radmayr; J Eberle; G Bartsch; H Klocker
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1993-12

9.  Prostate-specific antigen decline after casodex withdrawal: evidence for an antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome.

Authors:  E J Small; P R Carroll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 10.  Hormone-refractory (D3) prostate cancer: refining the concept.

Authors:  H I Scher; G Steineck; W K Kelly
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  16 in total

1.  The type of patients who would benefit from anti-androgen withdrawal therapy: could it be performed safely for aggressive prostate cancer?

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Nozomi Hayakawa; Taisuke Ezaki; Kenjiro Suzuki; Takahiro Maeda; Akiharu Ninomiya; So Nakamura
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Discovery and biological characterization of a novel series of androgen receptor modulators.

Authors:  C Zhou; G Wu; Y Feng; Q Li; H Su; D E Mais; Y Zhu; N Li; Y Deng; D Yang; M-W Wang
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Abiraterone acetate withdrawal syndrome: Speculations on the underlying mechanisms.

Authors:  Tomonori Kato; Akira Komiya; Joji Yuasa; Kanya Kaga; Mayuko Kaga; Satoko Kojima; Yukio Naya; Shigeo Isaka
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  Treating prostate cancer in elderly men: how does aging affect the outcome?

Authors:  Abhay R Shelke; Supriya G Mohile
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-09

5.  Growth of LAPC4 prostate cancer xenograft tumor is insensitive to 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride.

Authors:  Raquel Ramos Garcia; Khalid Z Masoodi; Laura E Pascal; Joel B Nelson; Zhou Wang
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2014-04-05

6.  Inhibition of prostate cancer cell growth by second-site androgen receptor antagonists.

Authors:  James D Joseph; Bryan M Wittmann; Mary A Dwyer; Huaxia Cui; Delita A Dye; Donald P McDonnell; John D Norris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Prostate cancer risk after anti-androgen treatment for priapism.

Authors:  Tabitha Goetz; Arthur L Burnett
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Drug costs in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Canada.

Authors:  Alice Dragomir; Daniela Dinea; Marie Vanhuyse; Fabio L Cury; Armen G Aprikian
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  A dramatic, objective antiandrogen withdrawal response: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yiu-Keung Lau; Manpreet K Chadha; Alan Litwin; Donald L Trump
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 17.388

10.  Stat3 enhances transactivation of steroid hormone receptors.

Authors:  Fernando De Miguel; Soo Ok Lee; Sergio A Onate; Allen C Gao
Journal:  Nucl Recept       Date:  2003-06-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.