Literature DB >> 11085251

Discrimination of the notifiable pathogen Gyrodactylus salaris from G. thymalli (Monogenea) using statistical classifiers applied to morphometric data.

E S McHugh1, A P Shinn, J W Kay.   

Abstract

The identification and discrimination of 2 closely related and morphologically similar species of Gyrodactylus, G. salaris and G. thymalli, were assessed using the statistical classification methodologies Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and k-Nearest Neighbours (KNN). These statistical methods were applied to morphometric measurements made on the gyrodactylid attachment hooks. The mean estimated classification percentages of correctly identifying each species were 98.1% (LDA) and 97.9% (KNN) for G. salaris and 99.9% (LDA) and 73.2% (KNN) for G. thymalli. The analysis was expanded to include another 2 closely related species and the new classification efficiencies were 94.6% (LDA) and 98.% (KNN) for G. salaris; 98.2% (LDA) and 72.6% (KNN) for G. thymalli; 86.7% (LDA) and 91.8% (KNN) for G. derjavini; and 76.5% (LDA) and 77.7% (KNN) for G. truttae. The higher correct classification scores of G. salaris and G. thymalli by the LDA classifier in the 2-species analysis over the 4-species analysis suggested the development of a 2-stage classifier. The mean estimated correct classification scores were 99.97% (LDA) and 99.99% (KNN) for the G. salaris-G. thymalli pairing and 99.4% (LDA) and 99.92% (KNN) for the G. derjavini-G. truttae pairing. Assessment of the 2-stage classifier using only marginal hook data was very good with classification efficiencies of 100% (LDA) and 99.6% (KNN) for the G. salaris G. thymalli pairing and 97.2% (LDA) and 99.2% (KNN) for the G. derjavini-G. truttae pairing. Paired species were then discriminated individually in the second stage of the classifier using data from the full set of hooks. These analyses demonstrate that using the methods of LDA and KNN statistical classification, the discrimination of closely related and pathogenic species of Gyrodactylus may be achieved using data derived from light microscope studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11085251     DOI: 10.1017/s0031182099006381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasitology        ISSN: 0031-1820            Impact factor:   3.234


  10 in total

1.  Demonstrating morphometric protocols using polystome marginal hooklet measurements.

Authors:  Louis H Du Preez; Milton F Maritz
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 1.431

Review 2.  Putting in shape: towards a unified approach for the taxonomic description of monogenean haptoral hard parts.

Authors:  M Vignon
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2011-06-04       Impact factor: 1.431

3.  Mitochondrial haplotype diversity of Gyrodactylus thymalli (Platyhelminthes; Monogenea): extended geographic sampling in United Kingdom, Poland, and Norway reveals further lineages.

Authors:  Haakon Hansen; Tor A Bakke; Lutz Bachmann
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Seasonal occurrence and metrical variability of Gyrodactylus rhodei Zitnan 1964 (Monogenea, Gyrodactylidae).

Authors:  M Dávidová; J Jarkovský; I Matejusová; M Gelnar
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Radial Basis Function Artificial Neural Network for the Investigation of Thyroid Cytological Lesions.

Authors:  Christos Fragopoulos; Abraham Pouliakis; Christos Meristoudis; Emmanouil Mastorakis; Niki Margari; Nicolaos Chroniaris; Nektarios Koufopoulos; Alexander G Delides; Nicolaos Machairas; Vasileia Ntomi; Konstantinos Nastos; Ioannis G Panayiotides; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Evangelos P Misiakos
Journal:  J Thyroid Res       Date:  2020-11-24

6.  The crossroads of molecular, typological and biological species concepts: two new species of Gyrodactylus Nordmann, 1832 (Monogenea: Gyrodactylidae).

Authors:  Marek S Zietara; Jaakko Lumme
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.431

7.  Reservoir hosts for Gyrodactylus salaris may play a more significant role in epidemics than previously thought.

Authors:  Giuseppe Paladini; Haakon Hansen; Chris F Williams; Nick G H Taylor; Olga L Rubio-Mejía; Scott J Denholm; Sigurd Hytterød; James E Bron; Andrew P Shinn
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 8.  Artificial Neural Networks as Decision Support Tools in Cytopathology: Past, Present, and Future.

Authors:  Abraham Pouliakis; Efrossyni Karakitsou; Niki Margari; Panagiotis Bountris; Maria Haritou; John Panayiotides; Dimitrios Koutsouris; Petros Karakitsos
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2016-02-18

9.  Identification of women for referral to colposcopy by neural networks: a preliminary study based on LBC and molecular biomarkers.

Authors:  Petros Karakitsos; Charalampos Chrelias; Abraham Pouliakis; George Koliopoulos; Aris Spathis; Maria Kyrgiou; Christos Meristoudis; Aikaterini Chranioti; Christine Kottaridi; George Valasoulis; Ioannis Panayiotides; Evangelos Paraskevaidis
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2012-10-03

10.  The Application of Classification and Regression Trees for the Triage of Women for Referral to Colposcopy and the Estimation of Risk for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Study Based on 1625 Cases with Incomplete Data from Molecular Tests.

Authors:  Abraham Pouliakis; Efrossyni Karakitsou; Charalampos Chrelias; Asimakis Pappas; Ioannis Panayiotides; George Valasoulis; Maria Kyrgiou; Evangelos Paraskevaidis; Petros Karakitsos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 3.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.