Literature DB >> 11084621

The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences.

P D Sniegowski1, P J Gerrish, T Johnson, A Shaver.   

Abstract

Natural selection can adjust the rate of mutation in a population by acting on allelic variation affecting processes of DNA replication and repair. Because mutation is the ultimate source of the genetic variation required for adaptation, it can be appealing to suppose that the genomic mutation rate is adjusted to a level that best promotes adaptation. Most mutations with phenotypic effects are harmful, however, and thus there is relentless selection within populations for lower genomic mutation rates. Selection on beneficial mutations can counter this effect by favoring alleles that raise the mutation rate, but the effect of beneficial mutations on the genomic mutation rate is extremely sensitive to recombination and is unlikely to be important in sexual populations. In contrast, high genomic mutation rates can evolve in asexual populations under the influence of beneficial mutations, but this phenomenon is probably of limited adaptive significance and represents, at best, a temporary reprieve from the continual selection pressure to reduce mutation. The physiological cost of reducing mutation below the low level observed in most populations may be the most important factor in setting the genomic mutation rate in sexual and asexual systems, regardless of the benefits of mutation in producing new adaptive variation. Maintenance of mutation rates higher than the minimum set by this "cost of fidelity" is likely only under special circumstances.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084621     DOI: 10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12<1057::AID-BIES3>3.0.CO;2-W

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioessays        ISSN: 0265-9247            Impact factor:   4.345


  164 in total

Review 1.  Stress-induced evolution and the biosafety of genetically modified microorganisms released into the environment.

Authors:  V V Velkov
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Mutator dynamics in fluctuating environments.

Authors:  J M J Travis; E R Travis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Spontaneously arising mutL mutators in evolving Escherichia coli populations are the result of changes in repeat length.

Authors:  Aaron C Shaver; Paul D Sniegowski
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 4.  General models of multilocus evolution.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick; Toby Johnson; Nick Barton
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Fitness evolution and the rise of mutator alleles in experimental Escherichia coli populations.

Authors:  Aaron C Shaver; Peter G Dombrowski; Joseph Y Sweeney; Tania Treis; Renata M Zappala; Paul D Sniegowski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The evolution of mutator genes in bacterial populations: the roles of environmental change and timing.

Authors:  Mark M Tanaka; Carl T Bergstrom; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Mutators in space: the dynamics of high-mutability clones in a two-patch model.

Authors:  E R Travis; J M J Travis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  The role of robustness in phenotypic adaptation and innovation.

Authors:  Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Evidence for elevated mutation rates in low-quality genotypes.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Rapid decline in fitness of mutation accumulation lines of gonochoristic (outcrossing) Caenorhabditis nematodes.

Authors:  Charles F Baer; Joanna Joyner-Matos; Dejerianne Ostrow; Veronica Grigaltchik; Matthew P Salomon; Ambuj Upadhyay
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.