Literature DB >> 11084177

Triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl estradiol for treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

A Davis1, A Godwin, J Lippman, W Olson, M Kafrissen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a triphasic combination oral contraceptive (OC) containing norgestimate and ethinyl estradiol (E2) and placebo in the treatment of metrorrhagic, menometrorrhagic, oligomenorrheic, and polymenorrheic dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB).
METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked study, 201 women (15-50 years of age) with DUB received triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl E2 or placebo, for three consecutive 28-day treatment cycles. Efficacy was determined by evaluating investigator and subject assessments of DUB resolution, abnormal uterine bleeding patterns during an 84-day reference period, and change from baseline in subjects' quality of life. The sample size was based on the assumption that the proportions of subjects exhibiting treatment success (percentage of subjects with investigator and subject overall assessments of DUB resolution of "improved") were 65% for the active group and 40% for the placebo group (alpha = 0.05, 1 - beta = 0.80).
RESULTS: More than 80% of subjects receiving triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl E2 had improvements in their abnormal bleeding patterns as assessed by investigators, and the subjects themselves compared with fewer than 50% of subjects in the placebo treatment group (P <.001). Abnormal bleeding patterns were reported by significantly fewer subjects receiving triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl E2 than in the placebo treatment group (P <. 001). Change from baseline in physical functioning (eg, self-care, walking, lifting, exercising) was significantly more improved in the triphasic norgestimate-ethinyl E2 group than in the placebo group.
CONCLUSION: The triphasic combination of norgestimate and ethinyl E2 is an effective treatment for metrorrhagic, menometrorrhagic, oligomenorrheic, and polymenorrheic dysfunctional uterine bleeding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11084177     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01029-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

Review 1.  Noncontraceptive health benefits of oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  Contraception in women over 40 years of age.

Authors:  Rebecca H Allen; Carrie A Cwiak; Andrew M Kaunitz
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Combined hormonal contraceptives for heavy menstrual bleeding.

Authors:  Anne Lethaby; Michelle R Wise; Maria Aj Weterings; Magdalena Bofill Rodriguez; Julie Brown
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-11

Review 4.  Abnormal uterine bleeding: a review of patient-based outcome measures.

Authors:  Kristen A Matteson; Lori A Boardman; Malcolm G Munro; Melissa A Clark
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Paula D James; Anne C Goodeve
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Treatment of patients with von Willebrand disease.

Authors:  Emma Tuohy; Emma Litt; Raza Alikhan
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2011-04-20

Review 7.  Hematological Profile Changes Among Oral Contraceptive Users: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Esayas Tekle; Yemataw Gelaw; Fikir Asrie
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2022-09-29

8.  How to measure "short-term hormonal effects"?

Authors:  Lothar A J Heinemann
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009-09-29

Review 9.  Use of Combined Oral Contraceptives in Perimenopausal Women.

Authors:  Moon Kyoung Cho
Journal:  Chonnam Med J       Date:  2018-09-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.