| Literature DB >> 36199529 |
Esayas Tekle1, Yemataw Gelaw2, Fikir Asrie2.
Abstract
Hematological profiles are measurable indices of blood that can be used to identify and monitor some pathological and physiological abnormalities. Oral contraceptives are one of the factors which may exert an influence on hematological laboratory test results and have a critical importance. Therefore, the main goal of this review was to evaluate the hematologic profile alterations brought on by the use of oral contraceptives. Accordingly, even though there were studies that showed no significant difference, most of the oral contraceptive users had higher hemoglobin, platelet, and erythrocyte counts than non-users. Other erythrocyte metrics, such as mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration and red cell dispersion width, did not significantly change. Moreover, leukocyte count and leukocyte differential count had no significant change among the oral contraceptive users in comparison to non-users. Oral contraceptive users typically have shorter prothrombin times, activated partial thromboplastin times, thrombin times, and greater levels of fibrinogen and D-dimer compared to non-users. However, this review is a narrative review and did not show the pooled effect of oral contraceptives on these hematological parameters. Therefore, it is recommended to do systematic and meta-analysis to determine the pooled effect of oral contraceptives.Entities:
Keywords: contraceptives; hematological parameters; hematopoiesis; hemostasis; oral contraceptives; thromboembolism
Year: 2022 PMID: 36199529 PMCID: PMC9528910 DOI: 10.2147/JBM.S379841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Blood Med ISSN: 1179-2736
Changes in Red Blood Cell Parameters Among Oral Contraceptive Users
| Parameter | OC Used | Result | Conclusion | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Users | Non-Users | ||||
| RBC × 1012/L | COC | 4.35 ± 0.48 | 4.14 ± 0.42 | Increase | [ |
| Progestin only | – | – | Decrease | [ | |
| COC | 4.4 ± 0.51 | 4.6 ± 0.39 | No difference | [ | |
| EVF (%) | COC | 37.64 ± 2.46 | 36.52 ± 3.56 | No difference | [ |
| COC | 34.42 | 36.40 | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 35.8 ± 3.27 | 37.3 ± 3.18 | No difference | [ | |
| Hb (g/dl) | Not indicated | – | – | Increase | [ |
| COC | – | – | Increase | [ | |
| COC | 12.45 | 12.67 | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 12.32 ± 0.81 | 11.93 ± 1.20 | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 11.9 ± 1.14 | 12.1 ± 1.24 | No difference | [ | |
| MCV | COC | 87.04 ± 5.92 | 88.03 ± 4.56 | No difference | [ |
| COC | 81.4 ± 8.67 | 81.0 ± 7.73 | No difference | [ | |
| MCH (pg) | COC | 28.73 ± 2.16 | 28.47 ± 1.76 | No difference | [ |
| COC | 27.2 ± 3.32 | 26.7 ± 2.96 | No difference | [ | |
| MCHC (g/dl) | COC | 32.71 ± 0.90 | 32.55 ± 0.93 | No difference | [ |
| COC | 33.3 ± 0.93 | 32.9 ± 1.13 | No difference | [ | |
| RDW (%) | COC | 13.05 ± 1.35 | 12.89 ± 1.61 | No difference | [ |
Note: The conclusions are derived from the respective authors listed.
Abbreviations: g/dl, gram per deciliter; pg, pico gram.
Changes in Platelet Parameters Among Oral Contraceptive Users
| Parameter | OC Used | Result | Conclusion | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Users | Non-Users | ||||
| Platelet ×109/L | COC | 270.59 | 249.75 | Increase | [ |
| COC | – | – | Increase | [ | |
| COC | 289.86 | 283.38 | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 206.28 ± 39.08 | 196.65 ± 35.12 | No difference | [ | |
| COC | – | – | No difference | [ | |
| COC | – | – | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 258 ± 100 | 294 ± 69 | No difference | [ | |
| MPV | COC | – | – | No difference | [ |
Note: The conclusions are derived from the respective authors listed.
Abbreviation: L, liter.
Changes in White Blood Cell Parameters Among Oral Contraceptive Users
| Parameter | OC Used | Result | Conclusion | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Users | Non-Users | ||||
| WBC ×109 /L | COC | 5.07 | 4.93 | No difference | [ |
| COC | – | – | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 6.49 | 6.99 | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 6.07 ± 1.29 | 6.19 ± 1.33 | No difference | [ | |
| LYM% | COC | 32.69 ± 3.83 | 32.81 ± 4.11 | No difference | [ |
| MON% | COC | 8.04 ± 1.63 | 8.30 ± 1.82 | No difference | [ |
| NEU% | COC | 56.12 ± 3.70 | 55.67 ± 4.14 | No difference | [ |
| EOS% | COC | 2.35 ± 1.10 | 2.16 ± 0.83 | No difference | [ |
| BAS% | COC | 0.91 ± 0.25 | 1.00 ± 0.34 | No difference | [ |
Note: The conclusions are derived from the respective authors listed.
Abbreviation: L, liter.
Changes in Coagulation Profile Among Oral Contraceptive Users
| Profile | Type of OC Used | Result | Conclusion | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OC Users | Non-Users | ||||
| PT in second | COC | 11.46 | 13.79 | Decrease | [ |
| COC | - | - | Decrease | [ | |
| COC | 13.4 | 13.6 | Decrease | [ | |
| COC | 12.8 ± 1.5 | 13.7 ± 2.05 | Decrease | [ | |
| COC | 10.35 | 10.78 | Decrease | [ | |
| Both | 14 | 13.4 | No difference | [ | |
| Not indicated | 14.8 ± 1.2 | 14.8 ± 2.1 | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 11.8 ± 2.27 | 12.4 ± 1.08 | No difference | [ | |
| Not indicated | 14 | 13.5 | No difference | [ | |
| APTT in second | COC | 27.99 | 32.49 | Decrease | [ |
| COC | 40.9 | 41.9 | Decrease | [ | |
| COC | 32.6 ± 1.92 | 33.7 ± 1.52 | Decrease | [ | |
| COC | 25.9 ± 2.61 | 28.3 ± 2.76 | Decrease | [ | |
| Not indicated | 31.3 | 33 | Decrease | [ | |
| Not indicated | 33.1 ± 3.9 | 34.3 ± 4.9 | No difference | [ | |
| COC | - | - | No difference | [ | |
| COC | 29.83 | 30.46 | No difference | [ | |
| TT in second | COC | 17.57 | 20.45 | Decrease | [ |
| COC | - | - | Decrease | [ | |
| COC | 11.9 ± 1.81 | 12.6 ± 1.27 | Decrease | [ | |
| Both | 9.1 | 9.8 | Decrease | [ | |
| Fibrinogen in mg/dl | COC | 387.10 | 276.85 | Increase | [ |
| COC | - | - | Increase | [ | |
| COC | 625 | 260 | Increase | [ | |
| COC | 347 ± 80.9 | 305.9 ± 45.99 | Increase | [ | |
| COC | 327.47 | 296.57 | Increase | [ | |
| Not indicated | 161.4 ± 64.3 | 161 ± 71 | No difference | [ | |
| Both | 266 | 249 | No difference | [ | |
| D-dimer in ng/mL | COC | 813.36 | 257.04 | Increase | [ |
| Not indicated | 1000 | Negative | Increase | [ | |
| COC | 350 ± 0.07 | 210± 0.07 | Increase | [ | |
Notes: Negative D-dimer value is when the D-dimer level is below a predetermined cut-off threshold. The conclusions are derived from the respective authors listed.