Literature DB >> 11082236

Risk-indifferent foraging behaviour in honeybees.

.   

Abstract

We studied the influence of variance in reward volume on choice behaviour of honeybees, Apis mellifera carnica, by training bees to collect sucrose solution from four newly developed artificial feeders. The feeders were electromechanical devices, each controlled by a microprocessor, which monitored the experiments, controlled reward delivery and stored the data. The parameters that varied between the feeders were the amount and variance of reward. The four feeders were arranged in two pairs, with the two feeders in each pair set to the same reward parameters. Constant feeders offered a fixed amount of sucrose solution at each bee visit; variable feeders offered a normally distributed reward with a standard deviation equal to the mean. We tested three reward combinations under two variance conditions. The bees matched their choice frequencies to the mean amount of reward. This applied both to the constant and the variable feeders. Thus the bees were able to discriminate feeders by the amount of reward and were able to estimate the mean reward for the variable flowers. The proportion of immediate returns to the same feeder increased with the amount of sucrose solution imbibed at each visit, indicating that bees were able to perceive the amount of reward at each visit. However, there was no influence of variance on the choice behaviour of the bees, ruling out the possibility that bees are risk sensitive under these conditions. We discuss risk indifference in choice behaviour of bees in the context of several models of risk sensitivity. Copyright 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11082236     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  8 in total

1.  FLOBOTS: ROBOTIC FLOWERS FOR BEE BEHAVIOUR EXPERIMENTS.

Authors:  Carla J Essenberg
Journal:  J Pollinat Ecol       Date:  2015

Review 2.  Uncertainty processing in bees exposed to free choices: Lessons from vertebrates.

Authors:  Patrick Anselme
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

3.  Assessment of food source profitability in honeybees (Apis mellifera): how does disturbance of foraging activity affect trophallactic behaviour?

Authors:  A J Wainselboim; F Roces; W M Farina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Learning reward expectations in honeybees.

Authors:  Mariana Gil; Rodrigo J De Marco; Randolf Menzel
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Relative gains, losses, and reference points in probabilistic choice in rats.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Aversive view memories and risk perception in navigating ants.

Authors:  Cody A Freas; Antoine Wystrach; Sebastian Schwarz; Marcia L Spetch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Serial position learning in honeybees.

Authors:  Randolf Menzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Irrational risk aversion in an ant.

Authors:  Massimo De Agrò; Daniel Grimwade; Richard Bach; Tomer J Czaczkes
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.084

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.