Literature DB >> 11080723

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-challenge evaluation of reported reactions to monosodium glutamate.

R S Geha1, A Beiser, C Ren, R Patterson, P A Greenberger, L C Grammer, A M Ditto, K E Harris, M A Shaughnessy, P R Yarnold, J Corren, A Saxon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The frequency of reactions reported to occur after the consumption of monosodium glutamate (MSG) is the subject of controversy.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a multicenter, multiphase, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a crossover design to evaluate reactions reportedly caused by MSG.
METHODS: In 3 of 4 protocols (A, B, and C), MSG was administered without food. A positive response was scored if the subject reported 2 or more symptoms from a list of 10 symptoms reported to occur after ingestion of MSG-containing foods within 2 hours. In protocol A 130 self-selected reportedly MSG-reactive volunteers were challenged with 5 g of MSG and with placebo on separate days (days 1 and 2). Of the 86 subjects who reacted to MSG, placebo, or both in protocol A, 69 completed protocol B to determine whether the response was consistent and dose dependent. To further examine the consistency and reproducibility of reactions to MSG, 12 of the 19 subjects who responded to 5 g of MSG but not to placebo in both protocols A and B were given, in protocol C, 2 challenges, each consisting of 5 g of MSG versus placebo.
RESULTS: Of 130 subjects in protocol A, 50 (38. 5%) responded to MSG only, 17 (13.1%) responded to placebo only (P <. 05), and 19 (14.6%) responded to both. Challenge with increasing doses of MSG in protocol B was associated with increased response rates. Only half (n = 19) of 37 subjects who reacted to 5 g of MSG but not placebo in protocol A reacted similarly in protocol B, suggesting inconsistency in the response. Two of the 19 subjects responded in both challenges to MSG but not placebo in protocol C; however, their symptoms were not reproducible in protocols A through C. These 2 subjects were challenged in protocol D 3 times with placebo and 3 times with 5 g of MSG in the presence of food. Both responded to only one of the MSG challenges in protocol D.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that large doses of MSG given without food may elicit more symptoms than a placebo in individuals who believe that they react adversely to MSG. However, neither persistent nor serious effects from MSG ingestion are observed, and the responses were not consistent on retesting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11080723     DOI: 10.1067/mai.2000.110794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  10 in total

Review 1.  Risk Assessment Paradigm for Glutamate.

Authors:  Ashley Roberts; Barry Lynch; Ivonne M C M Rietjens
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.374

2.  Association between salt substitutes/enhancers and changes in sodium levels in fast-food restaurants: a cross-sectional analysis.

Authors:  Mary J Scourboutakos; Sarah A Murphy; Mary R L'Abbé
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2018-03-07

3.  A review of the alleged health hazards of monosodium glutamate.

Authors:  Anca Zanfirescu; Anca Ungurianu; Aristides M Tsatsakis; George M Nițulescu; Demetrios Kouretas; Aris Veskoukis; Dimitrios Tsoukalas; Ayse B Engin; Michael Aschner; Denisa Margină
Journal:  Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 12.811

4.  Systemic administration of monosodium glutamate elevates intramuscular glutamate levels and sensitizes rat masseter muscle afferent fibers.

Authors:  Brian E Cairns; Xudong Dong; Mandeep K Mann; Peter Svensson; Barry J Sessle; Lars Arendt-Nielsen; Keith M McErlane
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 5.  Glutamate: A Safe Nutrient, Not Just a Simple Additive.

Authors:  Cécile Loï; Luc Cynober
Journal:  Ann Nutr Metab       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Food Intolerance and childhood asthma: what is the link?

Authors:  Janet L Beausoleil; Joel Fiedler; Jonathan M Spergel
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 7.  Sensitivity to food additives, vaso-active amines and salicylates: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Isabel J Skypala; M Williams; L Reeves; R Meyer; C Venter
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 5.871

Review 8.  Monosodium glutamate as a tool to reduce sodium in foodstuffs: Technological and safety aspects.

Authors:  Hellen D B Maluly; Adriana P Arisseto-Bragotto; Felix G R Reyes
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 9.  Hypersensitivity Reactions to Food Additives-Preservatives, Antioxidants, Flavor Enhancers.

Authors:  Mateusz Witkowski; Halina Grajeta; Krzysztof Gomułka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 10.  Does monosodium glutamate really cause headache? : a systematic review of human studies.

Authors:  Yoko Obayashi; Yoichi Nagamura
Journal:  J Headache Pain       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 7.277

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.