Literature DB >> 11080468

Why some women do not breast feed: bottle feeding and fathers' role.

S Earle1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore women's experiences and perceptions of baby feeding and to explore the explanations offered by women who choose to either breast or bottle feed.
DESIGN: A qualitative study, which was prospective in design. Participants were interviewed three times: the first stage was between six and 14 weeks of pregnancy; the second stage was between 34 and 39 weeks; and the third stage was between six and 14 weeks after childbirth. PARTICIPANTS: 19 participants were recruited to the study group via 12 antenatal clinics in Coventry, UK. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION: The data indicate that participants make baby-feeding decisions either prior to conception or early in the pregnancy. Findings also indicate that both breast and bottle feeders possessed knowledge of the benefits of breast feeding, but this did not seem to influence decision making. One of the most significant factors influencing the decision to bottle feed appears to be a desire for paternal involvement. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: To increase the incidence of breast feeding, health-care professionals should consider the need for preconceptual health promotion. The role of paternal involvement in baby-feeding decisions also needs to be acknowledged and men need to be included in breast-feeding promotion campaigns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11080468     DOI: 10.1054/midw.2000.0222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  18 in total

1.  Breastfeeding support - the importance of self-efficacy for low-income women.

Authors:  Francesca Entwistle; Sally Kendall; Marianne Mead
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  A meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's experience of breastfeeding.

Authors:  Elaine Burns; Virginia Schmied; Athena Sheehan; Jennifer Fenwick
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Promoting positive attitudes to breastfeeding: the development and evaluation of a theory-based intervention with school children involving a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Melanie Giles; Samantha Millar; Cherie Armour; Carol McClenahan; John Mallett; Barbara Stewart-Knox
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Characteristics of breastfeeding discussions at the initial prenatal visit.

Authors:  Jill R Demirci; Debra L Bogen; Cynthia Holland; Jill A Tarr; Doris Rubio; Jie Li; Marianne Nemecek; Judy C Chang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  The emotional and practical experiences of formula-feeding mothers.

Authors:  Victoria Fallon; Sophia Komninou; Kate M Bennett; Jason C G Halford; Joanne A Harrold
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Choking, allergic reactions, and pickiness: A qualitative study of maternal perceived threats and risk avoidance strategies during complementary feeding.

Authors:  Michelle Dorsey Graf; Melanie Lutenbacher; Heather Wasser; Mary S Dietrich; Sharon M Karp
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Breast or bottle? Eating disordered childbearing women and infant-feeding decisions.

Authors:  Helen Stapleton; Anna Fielder; Mavis Kirkham
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Access, Use, and Preferences for Technology-Based Perinatal and Breastfeeding Support Among Childbearing Women.

Authors:  Jill Radtke Demirci; Susan M Cohen; Maris Parker; Ashleigh Holmes; Debra L Bogen
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2016

9.  Men's views and experiences of infant feeding: A qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Earle; Robin Hadley
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 10.  Mothers' experiences of bottle-feeding: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies.

Authors:  R Lakshman; D Ogilvie; K K Ong
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.