Literature DB >> 11079889

Development and implementation of a decision support system for carotid artery stenosis: the Carotid Ultrasound Report Enhancement (CURE).

B F Gage1, G A Banet, M Goldstein, W Sumner.   

Abstract

The management of carotid artery stenosis is an art evolving into a science, increasingly informed by clinical trials of medical management versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Ideas about optimal management depend on the confluence of patient-specific variables, surgical expertise, and the state of medical knowledge. In this complex and progressing setting, an up-to-date decision support system could help physicians apply the latest evidence to patient care. Carotid ultrasonography (US) studies provide an excellent opportunity to aid in the therapy of carotid stenosis. We developed a Carotid US Report Enhancement (CURE) to augment carotid US reports with treatment-specific prognostic information and patient-specific portions of the American Heart Association's 1998 guideline for the management of carotid artery stenosis. In the process of designing and implementing the CURE software, we encountered and eventually solved a variety of problems. The first problem was that US test was not always precise enough to distinguish between a moderate and mild carotid stenosis. Likewise, the standard US reports did not elucidate several technical problems that decreased the reliability of the US result. Third, although 17 of 18 physicians agreed to receive the CURE reports, they requested non-incriminating wording. Fourth, vascular surgeons supervising the US laboratories were reluctant to support the CURE report if they thought it would be construed as prompting self-referral. Finally, information about some comorbid conditions (e.g. a history of atrial fibrillation) could not be obtained reliably from the patients. The result of responding to these problems is a decision support program that is increasingly robust, able to detect many of its own limitations, and capable of integrating data from multiple sources. A randomized controlled trial now in progress will evaluate the clinical impact of the CURE program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079889      PMCID: PMC2243903     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp        ISSN: 1531-605X


  14 in total

1.  Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association.

Authors:  J Biller; W M Feinberg; J E Castaldo; A D Whittemore; R E Harbaugh; R J Dempsey; L R Caplan; T F Kresowik; D B Matchar; J f Toole; J D Easton; H P Adams; L M Brass; R W Hobson; T G Brott; L Sternau
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  The limitations of carotid sonography: interpretive and technology-related errors.

Authors:  M M Horrow; J Stassi; A Shurman; J D Brody; C L Kirby; H K Rosenberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Cost-effectiveness of screening for carotid stenosis in asymptomatic persons.

Authors:  T T Lee; N A Solomon; P A Heidenreich; J Oehlert; A M Garber
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Cost-effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  E S Nussbaum; R C Heros; D L Erickson
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Physicians' attitudes toward oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  M Kutner; G Nixon; F Silverstone
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-10

6.  Comparison of probability of stroke between the Copenhagen City Heart Study and the Framingham Study.

Authors:  T Truelsen; E Lindenstrøm; G Boysen
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  O Benavente; D Moher; B Pham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-11-28

8.  Factors contributing to stroke in patients with atherosclerotic disease of the great vessels: the role of diabetes.

Authors:  J Weinberger; V Biscarra; M K Weisberg; J H Jacobson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1983 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Stroke risk profile: adjustment for antihypertensive medication. The Framingham Study.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino; P A Wolf; A J Belanger; W B Kannel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  D B Hood; M A Mattos; A Mansour; D E Ramsey; K J Hodgson; L D Barkmeier; D S Sumner
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  1 in total

1.  Rural, suburban, and urban differences in factors that impact physician adherence to clinical preventive service guidelines.

Authors:  Elaine C Khoong; Wesley S Gibbert; Jane M Garbutt; Walton Sumner; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  J Rural Health       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.333

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.