Literature DB >> 11079459

Nuclear transfer, genome reprogramming and novel opportunities in cell therapy.

M Zuccotti1, S Garagna, C A Redi.   

Abstract

The knowledge of the molecular mechanism involved in cell differentiation during embryonic development is central for the understanding of differentiative processes including those involved in the progression of genetic diseases. This knowledge would permit the development of new strategies for cell and gene therapies. It has recently been shown that mice can develop to term enucleated oocytes injected with the nuclei of somatic cells. These experiments demonstrate the capacity of the mouse oocyte to remodel the genetic programme of a somatic cells nucleus in order to make it capable of initiating and continuing embryonic development. The activation of zygotic genes occurs in the mouse by the 2-cell stage and it is a crucial event in the life of the newly formed mouse embryo as lack or wrong timing of zygotic gene expression leads to the death of the embryo. For these reasons the gentic modifications (reprogramming) induced by the oocyte over the newly injected somatic nucleus must be completed before zygotic genome activation occurs. The understanding of the mechanisms that intervene in the processes of cell differentiation and in those that make it a reversible process, would allow to repeat the process of nucleus reprogramming in an in vitro system, without the use of the female gamete. Here we will describe some of the genome modifications that might be involved in the reprogramming process following the transfer of a terminally differentiated somatic nucleus into the cytoplasm of an enucleated oocyte.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11079459     DOI: 10.1007/BF03343786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest        ISSN: 0391-4097            Impact factor:   4.256


  52 in total

1.  Perturbation of nuclear architecture by long-distance chromosome interactions.

Authors:  A F Dernburg; K W Broman; J C Fung; W F Marshall; J Philips; D A Agard; J W Sedat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-05-31       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells.

Authors:  I Wilmut; A E Schnieke; J McWhir; A J Kind; K H Campbell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-02-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Chromatin structure and gene expression in the preimplantation mammalian embryo.

Authors:  E M Thompson
Journal:  Reprod Nutr Dev       Date:  1996

4.  Patients' voices: the powerful sound in the stem cell debate.

Authors:  D Perry
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-25       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Different central nervous system cell types display distinct and nonrandom arrangements of satellite DNA sequences.

Authors:  L Manuelidis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Human therapeutic cloning.

Authors:  R P Lanza; J B Cibelli; M D West
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 53.440

7.  Imprinting and X chromosome counting mechanisms determine Xist expression in early mouse development.

Authors:  G F Kay; S C Barton; M A Surani; S Rastan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-06-03       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Reproducible compartmentalization of individual chromosome domains in human CNS cells revealed by in situ hybridization and three-dimensional reconstruction.

Authors:  L Manuelidis; J Borden
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.316

9.  Transient expression of translation initiation factor eIF-4C during the 2-cell stage of the preimplantation mouse embryo: identification by mRNA differential display and the role of DNA replication in zygotic gene activation.

Authors:  W Davis; P A De Sousa; R M Schultz
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Quantitative analysis of protein synthesis in mouse embryos. I. Extensive reprogramming at the one- and two-cell stages.

Authors:  K E Latham; J I Garrels; C Chang; D Solter
Journal:  Development       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  5 in total

1.  Histone deacetylase inhibitors improve in vitro and in vivo developmental competence of somatic cell nuclear transfer porcine embryos.

Authors:  Jianguo Zhao; Yanhong Hao; Jason W Ross; Lee D Spate; Eric M Walters; Melissa S Samuel; August Rieke; Clifton N Murphy; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.987

2.  Effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor oxamflatin on in vitro porcine somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.

Authors:  Liming Hou; Fanhua Ma; Jinzeng Yang; Hasan Riaz; Yongliang Wang; Wangjun Wu; Xiaoliang Xia; Zhiyuan Ma; Ying Zhou; Lin Zhang; Wenqin Ying; Dequan Xu; Bo Zuo; Zhuqing Ren; Yuanzhu Xiong
Journal:  Cell Reprogram       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.987

3.  Chromatin modifying agents in the in vitro production of bovine embryos.

Authors:  Fabio Morato Monteiro; Clara Slade Oliveira; Letícia Zoccolaro Oliveira; Naiara Zoccal Saraiva; Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante; Flavia Lombardi Lopes; Daniel Robert Arnold; Joaquim Mansano Garcia
Journal:  Vet Med Int       Date:  2010-09-29

4.  The relationship between cisplatin resistance and histone deacetylase isoform overexpression in epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Min-Gyun Kim; Jhang Ho Pak; Won Ho Choi; Jeong-Yeol Park; Joo-Hyun Nam; Jong-Hyeok Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 5.  Lessons Learned from Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer.

Authors:  Chantel Gouveia; Carin Huyser; Dieter Egli; Michael S Pepper
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.