Literature DB >> 11076055

A preliminary validation of a family history assessment form to select women at risk for breast or ovarian cancer for referral to a genetics center.

C A Gilpin1, N Carson, A G Hunter.   

Abstract

The medical community and general population have become aware that genetic testing is available to look for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. However, criteria for who should be referred for genetic counseling and possible subsequent testing have yet to be determined, and many genetics centers have been overwhelmed by the demand for service. We set out to develop a family history assessment tool (FHAT) that could be used by physicians to select individuals for genetic counseling. Arbitrarily, we chose individuals who would have an approximate doubling of their lifetime risk for breast or ovarian cancer. The FHAT was then applied to 184 unrelated families, with an index patient who had breast or ovarian cancer and who had accepted the offer of BRCA1 BRCA2 testing. Data were compiled to compare the number of individuals who would have been referred for genetic counseling and the number of mutation-positive individuals who would have been screened out from counseling using FHAT, the tables from Claus, and the BRCAPRO system. In this population, FHAT was effective in minimizing both the number of referrals and the likelihood of missing women who were later found to be mutation-positive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11076055     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2000.580408.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  31 in total

1.  A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO.

Authors:  D G R Evans; D M Eccles; N Rahman; K Young; M Bulman; E Amir; A Shenton; A Howell; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.318

2.  BayesMendel: an R environment for Mendelian risk prediction.

Authors:  Sining Chen; Wenyi Wang; Karl W Broman; Hormuzd A Katki; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-17

3.  A Prospective Comparison Study of Different Methods of Gathering Self-Reported Family History Information for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Caroline Benjamin; Katie Booth; Ian Ellis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Why do women not return family history forms when referred to breast cancer genetics services? A mixed-method study.

Authors:  Kirstie A Hanning; Michael Steel; David Goudie; Lorna McLeish; Jackie Dunlop; Jessica Myring; Frank Sullivan; Jonathan Berg; Gerry Humphris; Gozde Ozakinci
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  A two-stage approach to genetic risk assessment in primary care.

Authors:  Swati Biswas; Philamer Atienza; Jonathan Chipman; Amanda L Blackford; Banu Arun; Kevin Hughes; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  The BRCAPRO 5.0 model is a useful tool in genetic counseling and clinical management of male breast cancer cases.

Authors:  Ines Zanna; Piera Rizzolo; Francesco Sera; Mario Falchetti; Paolo Aretini; Giuseppe Giannini; Giovanna Masala; Alberto Gulino; Domenico Palli; Laura Ottini
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Outcomes of a systems-level intervention offering breast cancer risk assessments to low-income underserved women.

Authors:  Darren Mays; McKane E Sharff; Tiffani A DeMarco; Bernice Williams; Beth Beck; Vanessa B Sheppard; Beth N Peshkin; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Predictors of decision making in families at risk for inherited breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; James Janisse; Robin Gold; Michelle Cichon; Lisa Berry-Bobovski; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.267

9.  Literacy assessment of family health history tools for public health prevention.

Authors:  C Wang; R E Gallo; L Fleisher; S M Miller
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Risk perception and cancer worries in families at increased risk of familial breast/ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Mellon; Robin Gold; James Janisse; Michelle Cichon; Michael A Tainsky; Michael S Simon; Jeannette Korczak
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.