Literature DB >> 11073807

Chromogenic in situ hybridization: a practical alternative for fluorescence in situ hybridization to detect HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in archival breast cancer samples.

M Tanner1, D Gancberg, A Di Leo, D Larsimont, G Rouas, M J Piccart, J Isola.   

Abstract

Determination of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification has become necessary for selection of breast cancer patients for trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently regarded as a gold standard method for detecting HER-2/neu amplification, but it is not very practical for routine histopathological laboratories. We evaluated a new modification of in situ hybridization, the chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), which enables detection of HER-2/neu gene copies with conventional peroxidase reaction. Archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissue sections were pretreated (by heating in a microwave oven and using enzyme digestion) and hybridized with a digoxigenin-labeled DNA probe. The probe was detected with anti-digoxigenin fluorescein, anti-fluorescein peroxidase, and diaminobenzidine. Gene copies visualized by CISH could be easily distinguished with a x40 objective in hematoxylin-stained tissue sections. HER-2/neu amplification typically appeared as large peroxidase-positive intranuclear gene copy clusters. CISH and FISH (according to Vysis, made from frozen pulverized tumor samples) correlated well in a series of 157 breast cancers (kappa coefficient, 0.81). The few different classifications were mostly because of low-level amplifications by FISH that were negative by CISH and immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibody CB-11. We conclude that CISH, using conventional bright-field microscopy in evaluation, is a useful alternative for determination of HER-2/neu amplification in paraffin-embedded tumor samples, especially for confirming the immunohistochemical staining results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11073807      PMCID: PMC1885742          DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64785-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9440            Impact factor:   4.307


  16 in total

1.  The HercepTest assay: another perspective.

Authors:  F Espinoza; A Anguiano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Determination of Her-2/Neu status in breast carcinoma: comparative analysis of immunohistochemistry and fluorescent in situ hybridization.

Authors:  R E Jimenez; T Wallis; P Tabasczka; D W Visscher
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  HER-2/neu gene amplification characterized by fluorescence in situ hybridization: poor prognosis in node-negative breast carcinomas.

Authors:  M F Press; L Bernstein; P A Thomas; L F Meisner; J Y Zhou; Y Ma; G Hung; R A Robinson; C Harris; A El-Naggar; D J Slamon; R N Phillips; J S Ross; S R Wolman; K J Flom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Sensitivity of HER-2/neu antibodies in archival tissue samples of invasive breast carcinomas. Correlation with oncogene amplification in 160 cases.

Authors:  D Gancberg; L Lespagnard; G Rouas; M Paesmans; M Piccart; A Di Leo; J M Nogaret; D Hertens; A Verhest; D Larsimont
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Multi-colour brightfield in situ hybridisation on tissue sections.

Authors:  A H Hopman; S Claessen; E J Speel
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  1997 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 4.304

6.  Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of HER-2/neu in breast cancer.

Authors:  T W Jacobs; A M Gown; H Yaziji; M J Barnes; S J Schnitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Detection and quantitation of HER-2/neu gene amplification in human breast cancer archival material using fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  G Pauletti; W Godolphin; M F Press; D J Slamon
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1996-07-04       Impact factor: 9.867

8.  The role of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization for HER2/neu in assessing the prognosis of breast cancer.

Authors:  M S Mitchell; M F Press
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.929

9.  ERBB2 amplification in breast cancer analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  O P Kallioniemi; A Kallioniemi; W Kurisu; A Thor; L C Chen; H S Smith; F M Waldman; D Pinkel; J W Gray
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Sensitivity of HER-2/neu antibodies in archival tissue samples: potential source of error in immunohistochemical studies of oncogene expression.

Authors:  M F Press; G Hung; W Godolphin; D J Slamon
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1994-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  79 in total

1.  Abstracts of the 8th International Pituitary Pathology Meeting. October 5-9, 2001. Greece.

Authors: 
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.943

2.  Gold-facilitated in situ hybridization: a bright-field autometallographic alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of Her-2/neu gene amplification.

Authors:  Raymond Tubbs; James Pettay; Marek Skacel; Richard Powell; Mark Stoler; Patrick Roche; James Hainfeld
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.307

3.  Guidelines for HER2 testing in the UK.

Authors:  E D Hsi; R R Tubbs
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Automatic quantification of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer from chromogenic in situ hybridization whole slide images.

Authors:  Md Shakhawat Hossain; Matthew G Hanna; Naohiro Uraoka; Tomoya Nakamura; Marcia Edelweiss; Edi Brogi; Meera R Hameed; Masahiro Yamaguchi; Dara S Ross; Yukako Yagi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-11-21

5.  Novel bright field molecular morphology methods for detection of HER2 gene amplification.

Authors:  Raymond Tubbs; James Pettay; David Hicks; Marek Skacel; Richard Powell; Tom Grogan; James Hainfeld
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.611

6.  CHEK2 mutations in primary glioblastomas.

Authors:  Satu-Leena Sallinen; Tarja Ikonen; Hannu Haapasalo; Johanna Schleutker
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization with other methodologies for HER2 status assessment in breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Hauser-Kronberger; Nadia Dandachi
Journal:  J Mol Histol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.611

8.  Amplification and overexpression of KIT, PDGFRA, and VEGFR2 in medulloblastomas and primitive neuroectodermal tumors.

Authors:  Tea Blom; Annariikka Roselli; Valtteri Häyry; Olli Tynninen; Kirmo Wartiovaara; Miikka Korja; Kristiina Nordfors; Hannu Haapasalo; Nina N Nupponen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Intrinsic subtypes and genomic signatures of primary breast cancer and prognosis after systemic relapse.

Authors:  Claudette Falato; Nicholas P Tobin; Julie Lorent; Linda S Lindström; Jonas Bergh; Theodoros Foukakis
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Quantitative real-time RT-PCR and chromogenic in situ hybridization: precise methods to detect HER-2 status in breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Fabíola E Rosa; Sara M Silveira; Cássia G T Silveira; Nádia A Bérgamo; Francisco A Moraes Neto; Maria A C Domingues; Fernando A Soares; José R F Caldeira; Silvia R Rogatto
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.