Literature DB >> 11073210

Stochastic resonance and signal detection in an energy detector--implications for biological receptor systems.

J Tougaard1.   

Abstract

Stochastic resonance is demonstrated in a simple energy detector model, as a non-monotonic relationship between signal-to-noise ratio and detection of a sinusoid signal in bandpass-limited Gaussian noise. The behaviour of the model detecting signals of various intensities and signal-to-noise ratios was investigated. Significant improvement in detection was obtained by adding noise for mean signal intensities below the detection criterion of the detector. The range of usable noise levels, however, may be too small to be biologically meaningful. It is demonstrated that improving detection in the analysed model by adding noise to an otherwise undetectable signal is only at best as efficient as what can be obtained by adjusting the criterion to the signal-to-noise ratio. Improving detection by means of stochastic resonance is thus a sub-optimal strategy. It is speculated whether a demonstration of stochastic resonance in a biological system indicates any adaptive significance. More than anything, it indicates the presence of a mismatch between receptor sensitivity and the signal-to-noise ratio of the experiment, not the cause of this mismatch.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11073210     DOI: 10.1007/s004220000176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Cybern        ISSN: 0340-1200            Impact factor:   2.086


  5 in total

1.  Cues for masked amplitude-modulation detection.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  How to discern external acoustic waves in a piezoelectric neuron under noise?

Authors:  Ying Xie; Jun Ma
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 1.560

Review 3.  What is stochastic resonance? Definitions, misconceptions, debates, and its relevance to biology.

Authors:  Mark D McDonnell; Derek Abbott
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.475

4.  Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation.

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  The heterospecific calling song can improve conspecific signal detection in a bushcricket species.

Authors:  Zainab A S Abdelatti; Manfred Hartbauer
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.208

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.