Literature DB >> 11071606

Evaluation of multiphase implants for repair of focal osteochondral defects in goats.

G G Niederauer1, M A Slivka, N C Leatherbury, D L Korvick, H H Harroff, W C Ehler, C J Dunn, K Kieswetter.   

Abstract

The use of biodegradable scaffolds for articular cartilage repair has been investigated by numerous researchers. The objective of this screening study was to examine how the mechanical and physical properties of four multiphase implants can affect the cartilage healing response. Multiphase implant prototypes were prepared using poly(D,L)lactide-co-glycolide as the base material. PGA fibers (FR), 45S5 Bioglass (BG) and medical grade calcium sulfate (MGCS) were used as additives to vary stiffness and chemical properties. Osteochondral defects (3 mm dia. and 4 mm in depth) were created bilaterally in the medial femoral condyle (high-weight bearing) and the distal medial portion of the patellar groove (low-weight bearing) of 16 Spanish goats. Half of the implants were loaded with autologous costochondral chondrocytes. Defect sites (total n = 64, 4 sites/treatment) were randomly treated and allowed to heal for 16 weeks, fully weight bearing. At euthanasia, gross evaluations and biomechanical testing were conducted. Histological sections of the defect sites were stained with H and E, Safranin O/Fast Green or processed to analyze collagen architecture. Sections were semi-quantitatively scored for repair tissue structure. Qualitative evaluations showed that all groups had a high percentage of hyaline cartilage and good bony restoration, with new tissue integrating well with the native cartilage. Gross and histology scoring indicated a significantly higher score for defect healing in the condyle than in the patellar groove, but no difference in healing for implant types or addition/omission of cells was found. This investigation demonstrates that focal, osteochondral defects in caprine distal femurs treated with various implant constructs were repaired with hyaline-like cartilage and good underlying bone. The multiphase implants show potential for treatment of osteochondral defects and long-term studies need to be undertaken to confirm the longevity of the regenerated tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11071606     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00124-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  45 in total

Review 1.  Engineering orthopedic tissue interfaces.

Authors:  Peter J Yang; Johnna S Temenoff
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral knee defects with resorbable biphasic synthetic scaffold: clinical and radiological results and long-term survival analysis.

Authors:  Riccardo D'Ambrosi; Francesco Giacco; Vincenza Ragone; Nicola Ursino
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Novel alginate biphasic scaffold for osteochondral regeneration: an in vivo evaluation in rabbit and sheep models.

Authors:  Giuseppe Filardo; Francesco Perdisa; Michael Gelinsky; Florian Despang; Milena Fini; Maurilio Marcacci; Anna Paola Parrilli; Alice Roffi; Francesca Salamanna; Maria Sartori; Kathleen Schütz; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Mechanically cartilage-mimicking poly(PCL-PTHF urethane)/collagen nanofibers induce chondrogenesis by blocking NF-kappa B signaling pathway.

Authors:  Tongmeng Jiang; Dan Kai; Sijia Liu; Xianyuan Huang; Shujun Heng; Jinmin Zhao; Benjamin Qi Yu Chan; Xian Jun Loh; Ye Zhu; Chuanbin Mao; Li Zheng
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Tissue engineering strategies for the regeneration of orthopedic interfaces.

Authors:  Helen H Lu; Siddarth D Subramony; Margaret K Boushell; Xinzhi Zhang
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 6.  Animal models for cartilage regeneration and repair.

Authors:  Constance R Chu; Michal Szczodry; Stephen Bruno
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 7.  An overview of recent patents on musculoskeletal interface tissue engineering.

Authors:  Rohit T Rao; Daniel P Browe; Christopher J Lowe; Joseph W Freeman
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 3.417

Review 8.  The subchondral bone in articular cartilage repair: current problems in the surgical management.

Authors:  Andreas H Gomoll; Henning Madry; Gunnar Knutsen; Niek van Dijk; Romain Seil; Mats Brittberg; Elizaveta Kon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Platelet autologous growth factors decrease the osteochondral regeneration capability of a collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold in a sheep model.

Authors:  Elizaveta Kon; Giuseppe Filardo; Marco Delcogliano; Milena Fini; Francesca Salamanna; Gianluca Giavaresi; Ivan Martin; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  An arthroscopic approach for the treatment of osteochondral focal defects with cell-free and cell-loaded PLGA scaffolds in sheep.

Authors:  C Fonseca; M Caminal; D Peris; J Barrachina; P J Fàbregas; F Garcia; J J Cairó; F Gòdia; A Pla; J Vives
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.058

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.