Literature DB >> 11070636

The National Outcomes Management Project: a benchmarking collaborative.

N A Dewan1, A Daniels, G Zieman, T Kramer.   

Abstract

Traditional evaluation of health care quality usually involves the measurement of the structure, process, and outcome of care. Most quality improvement programs involve a cycle that includes a setting of goals, a measurement of either process or outcomes, and a real-time or retrospective feedback of the results of data measurement. Benchmarking, a well-known efficient business technology, can lead to practice innovations necessary to survive in an environment that has a need for decreasing cost and increasing quality. The purpose of this article is to present a novel use of benchmarking in managed ambulatory behavioral health care and its application in a model collaborative outcome management project at more than 16 sites and nine states in the United States.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11070636     DOI: 10.1007/BF02287824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  11 in total

1.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Balancing science and practice in indicator development: the Maryland Hospital Association Quality Indicator (QI) project.

Authors:  V A Kazandjian; P Wood; J Lawthers
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 3.  Implementing a statewide outcomes management system for consumers of public mental health services.

Authors:  J A Clardy; B M Booth; L G Smith; C R Nordquist; G R Smith
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Benchmarking patient satisfaction at academic health centers.

Authors:  D A Drachman
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1996-05

Review 5.  Evaluating the quality of medical care.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q       Date:  1966-07

6.  Benchmarking: a performance intervention tool.

Authors:  A B Campbell
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1994-05

7.  Tertiary cancer services in Britain: benchmarking study of activity and facilities at 12 specialist centres.

Authors:  M A Richards; J C Parrott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-10

8.  Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation.

Authors:  S V Eisen; D L Dill; M C Grob
Journal:  Hosp Community Psychiatry       Date:  1994-03

9.  Benchmarking applied to health care.

Authors:  R C Camp; A G Tweet
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1994-05

10.  Benchmarking in health care: turning challenges into success.

Authors:  T Berkey
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv       Date:  1994-05
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Benchmarking: a method for continuous quality improvement in health.

Authors:  Amina Ettorchi-Tardy; Marie Levif; Philippe Michel
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2012-05

2.  RCGP Quality Team Development programme: an illuminative evaluation.

Authors:  F Macfarlane; T Greenhalgh; T Schofield; T Desombre
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.