Literature DB >> 11070342

Viability and rate of development at different temperatures in Drosophila: a comparison of constant and alternating thermal regimes.

.   

Abstract

Populations belonging to the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans were collected in Southwestern France and Southern Spain, and investigated under constant (CT) and alternating (AT) temperature regimes. Development under CT was possible between 11 and 32 degrees C and egg-to-adult viability curves were almost 'rectangular', with a sharp decrease below 14 and above 29 degrees C. Rate of development followed a complex non-linear curve. A model described the curve as an exponential below a critical temperature (T(C)), and above T(C) as the difference between this function and another exponential which is assumed to show deleterious effects of heat. Developmental rates under two daily 12-h phases with various mid-temperatures and thermal amplitudes were compared to expected rates calculated from the above model. Acceleration effects were observed at four AT (in increasing order: 12-30, 9-21, 11-21, 16-26 degrees C); retardation occurred at three other ones (in increasing order, 7-21, 5-15, 7-29 degrees C). When expressed by the ratio observed/expected, the effects could be predicted using a multiple regression, as a positive function of the thermal amplitude and a negative one of the mid-temperature. Viability under AT was analysed considering an equivalent developmental temperature (EDT), that is the CT which would produce the same rate or development. Very low viabilities occurred under broad amplitude regimes, but the deleterious effects of some extreme temperatures, that would be lethal under CT, could be recovered by daily return to a moderate temperature. The two species exhibited slight but significant differences in their characteristic temperatures: developmental zero, critical temperature, temperature of maximum rate, upper developmental limit. All data may be interpreted by considering that D. simulans compared to D. melanogaster is more tolerant to cold but less tolerant to heat.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11070342     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4565(00)00022-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Therm Biol        ISSN: 0306-4565            Impact factor:   2.902


  25 in total

1.  Phenotypic plasticity of body size in a temperate population of Drosophila melanogaster: when the temperature-size rule does not apply.

Authors:  Jean R David; Hélène Legout; Brigitte Moreteau
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Physiological Diversity in Insects: Ecological and Evolutionary Contexts.

Authors:  Steven L Chown; John S Terblanche
Journal:  Adv In Insect Phys       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.364

3.  Repeated stress exposure results in a survival-reproduction trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Katie E Marshall; Brent J Sinclair
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Assay conditions in laboratory experiments: is the use of constant rather than fluctuating temperatures justified when investigating temperature-induced plasticity?

Authors:  Klaus Fischer; Nadine Kölzow; Henriette Höltje; Isabell Karl
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Genetic variability and phenotypic plasticity of metric thoracic traits in an invasive drosophilid in America.

Authors:  Blanche Christine Bitner-Mathé; Jean Robert David
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 1.082

6.  Fly wing vein patterns have spatial reproducibility of a single cell.

Authors:  Laurent Abouchar; Mariela D Petkova; Cynthia R Steinhardt; Thomas Gregor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  A series of unfortunate events: characterizing the contingent nature of physiological extremes using long-term environmental records.

Authors:  W Wesley Dowd; Mark W Denny
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Quantitative morphometrical analysis of a North African population of Drosophila melanogaster: sexual dimorphism, and comparison with European populations.

Authors:  M Chakir; H Negoua; B Moreteau; J R David
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

9.  Genomic Patterns of Geographic Differentiation in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Alisa Sedghifar; Perot Saelao; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  An Automated Method to Determine the Performance of Drosophila in Response to Temperature Changes in Space and Time.

Authors:  Andrea Soto-Padilla; Rick Ruijsink; Mark Span; Hedderik van Rijn; Jean-Christophe Billeter
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 1.355

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.