Literature DB >> 11069727

A technique for 3D in vivo quantification of proton density and magnetization transfer coefficients of knee joint cartilage.

J Hohe1, S Faber, T Stammberger, M Reiser, K H Englmeier, F Eckstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop an MR-based method for the in vivo evaluation of the structural composition of articular cartilage.
DESIGN: Five sagittal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols were acquired throughout the knee joint of 15 healthy volunteers and the boundaries of the cartilage segmented from a previously validated sequence with high contrast between cartilage and surrounding tissue. The other sequences were matched to these data, using a 3D least-squares fit algorithm to exclude motion artefacts. In this way secondary images were computed that included information about the proton density (interstitial water content) and the magnetization transfer coefficient (macromolecules, collagen). The average signal intensities of the 3D cartilage plates were extracted from these data sets and related to a phantom.
RESULTS: The signal intensity data showed a high interindividual variability for the proton density (patella 31%, lateral tibia 36%, medial tibia 29%); the patella displaying higher values than the tibia (P< 0.001). There were high correlations between the three plates. The magnetization transfer coefficient also showed high variability (patella 25%, lateral tibia 32%, medial tibia 30%) with the lowest values in the medial tibia (P< 0.01) and lower correlations between the plates. The slice-to-slice variation (medial to lateral) ranged from 9% to 24%.
CONCLUSION: An MR-based method has been developed for evaluating the proton density and magnetization transfer of articular cartilage in vivo and observing systematic differences between knee joint cartilage plates. The technique has the potential to supply information about the water content and collagen of articular cartilage, in particular at the early state of osteoarthritic degeneration. Copyright 2000 OsteoArthritis Research Society International.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11069727     DOI: 10.1053/joca.1999.0318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage        ISSN: 1063-4584            Impact factor:   6.576


  11 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic targets in osteoarthritis: from today to tomorrow with new imaging technology.

Authors:  J-P Pelletier; J Martel-Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 2.  Imaging osteoarthritis: magnetic resonance imaging versus x-ray.

Authors:  Charles Peterfy; Manish Kothari
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 3.  MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Magnetization transfer analysis of cartilage repair tissue: a preliminary study.

Authors:  F Palmieri; F De Keyzer; F Maes; I Van Breuseghem
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  MR imaging findings in the follow-up of patients with different stages of knee osteoarthritis and the correlation with clinical symptoms.

Authors:  Catherine M Phan; Thomas M Link; Gabrielle Blumenkrantz; Timothy C Dunn; Michael D Ries; Lynne S Steinbach; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The value of water-excitation 3D FLASH and fat-saturated PDw TSE MR imaging for detecting and grading articular cartilage lesions of the knee.

Authors:  Andreas Mohr
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Meniscal tear and extrusion are strongly associated with progression of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis as assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M-J Berthiaume; J-P Raynauld; J Martel-Pelletier; F Labonté; G Beaudoin; D A Bloch; D Choquette; B Haraoui; R D Altman; M Hochberg; J M Meyer; G A Cline; J-P Pelletier
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 8.  Ultrastructural MR imaging techniques of the knee articular cartilage: problems for routine clinical application.

Authors:  I Van Breuseghem
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Quantitative bone matrix density measurement by water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) with polymer calibration phantoms.

Authors:  Haihui Cao; Jerome L Ackerman; Mirko I Hrovat; Lila Graham; Melvin J Glimcher; Yaotang Wu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Quantitative cartilage imaging in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Felix Eckstein; Wolfgang Wirth
Journal:  Arthritis       Date:  2010-12-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.