Literature DB >> 11068328

Genetic changes in clinically organ-confined prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization.

W Fu1, L Bubendorf, N Willi, H Moch, M J Mihatsch, G Sauter, T C Gasser.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The genetic basis underlying prostate cancer development and progression is poorly understood. The primary aim of this study was to identify chromosomal regions important for progression in clinically localized prostate cancer removed by radical prostatectomy.
METHODS: Comparative genomic hybridization was used for whole genome screening of DNA sequence copy number alterations in 28 pathologically organ-confined tumors (pT2) and 28 tumors with infiltration of the seminal vesicles (pT3b).
RESULTS: Comparative genomic hybridization analysis showed on average 2.0 +/- 2.4 chromosomal alterations per tumor with more frequent losses (mean 1.3 +/- 1.8) than gains (mean 0.7 +/- 1.0). The percentage of tumors without alterations was higher in Stage pT2 (21%) than in Stage pT3b (50%). Losses of 8p (21%), 13q (21%), 5q (14%), 16q (14%), and 18q (13%) and gains of Xq (21%) and 8q (9%) were the most prevalent changes. Distinct regional alterations included minimal overlapping regions of loss at 5q13-q21, 6q14-q21, and 18q21-qter. There was only a small increase in the number of alterations from Stage pT2 to Stage pT3b (mean 1.6 +/- 2.3 versus 2.5 +/- 2.4). However, two individual alterations-gain of 8q and loss of 18q-were significantly more frequent in Stage pT3b than in Stage pT2 prostate cancer (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively), suggesting that genes in these regions may be important for prostate cancer progression.
CONCLUSIONS: The detection of chromosome 8q gains and 18q losses and the identification of the corresponding target genes could become a molecular tool for better characterization of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11068328     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00722-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

Review 1.  Not just for housekeeping: protein initiation and elongation factors in cell growth and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Sarah Thornton; Nisha Anand; Dan Purcell; Jonathan Lee
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  The impact of genomic alterations on the transcriptome: a prostate cancer cell line case study.

Authors:  J Chaudhary; M Schmidt
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 5.239

3.  High-resolution analysis of paraffin-embedded and formalin-fixed prostate tumors using comparative genomic hybridization to genomic microarrays.

Authors:  Pamela L Paris; Donna G Albertson; Janneke C Alers; Armann Andaya; Peter Carroll; Jane Fridlyand; Ajay N Jain; Sherwin Kamkar; David Kowbel; Pieter-Jaap Krijtenburg; Daniel Pinkel; Fritz H Schröder; Kees J Vissers; Vivienne J E Watson; Mark F Wildhagen; Colin Collins; Herman Van Dekken
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Decrease and gain of gene expression are equally discriminatory markers for prostate carcinoma: a gene expression analysis on total and microdissected prostate tissue.

Authors:  Thomas Ernst; Manfred Hergenhahn; Marc Kenzelmann; Clemens D Cohen; Mahnaz Bonrouhi; Annette Weninger; Ralf Klären; Elisabeth F Gröne; Manfred Wiesel; Christof Güdemann; Jens Küster; Winfried Schott; Gerd Staehler; Matthias Kretzler; Monica Hollstein; Hermann-Josef Gröne
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Genome-wide analysis of allelic imbalance in prostate cancer using the Affymetrix 50K SNP mapping array.

Authors:  N Tørring; M Borre; K D Sørensen; C L Andersen; C Wiuf; T F Ørntoft
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Identification of FBXL4 as a Metastasis Associated Gene in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Elzbieta Stankiewicz; Xueying Mao; D Chas Mangham; Lei Xu; Marc Yeste-Velasco; Gabrielle Fisher; Bernard North; Tracy Chaplin; Bryan Young; Yuqin Wang; Jasmin Kaur Bansal; Sakunthala Kudahetti; Lucy Spencer; Christopher S Foster; Henrik Møller; Peter Scardino; R Tim Oliver; Jonathan Shamash; Jack Cuzick; Colin S Cooper; Daniel M Berney; Yong-Jie Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  High-level expression of protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor 12 is a strong and independent predictor of poor prognosis in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sören A Weidemann; Charlotte Sauer; Andreas M Luebke; Christina Möller-Koop; Stefan Steurer; Claudia Hube-Magg; Franziska Büscheck; Doris Höflmayer; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Till S Clauditz; Ronald Simon; Guido Sauter; Cosima Göbel; Patrick Lebok; David Dum; Christoph Fraune; Simon Kind; Sarah Minner; Jakob Izbicki; Thorsten Schlomm; Hartwig Huland; Hans Heinzer; Eike Burandt; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Asmus Heumann
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.