BACKGROUND: When several stenoses are present within 1 coronary artery, the hemodynamic significance of each stenosis is influenced by the presence of the other(s), and the calculation of coronary and fractional flow reserve (CFR and FFR) for each individual stenosis is confounded. Recently, we developed and experimentally validated a method to determine the true FFR of each stenosis as it would be after the removal of the other stenosis; the true FFR can be reliably predicted by coronary pressures measured before treatment at specific locations within the coronary artery using equations accounting for stenosis interaction. The aim of the present study was to test the validity of these equations in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study of 32 patients with 2 serial stenoses in 1 coronary artery, relevant pressures were measured before the intervention, after the treatment of 1 stenosis, and after the treatment of both stenoses. The true FFR of each stenosis (FFR(true)) was directly measured after the elimination of the other stenosis and compared with the value predicted (FFR(pred)) from the initial pressure measurements before treatment. Although the hyperemic gradient across 1 stenosis increased significantly (from 10+/-7 to 19+/-11 mm Hg after treatment of the other stenosis), FFR(pred) was close to FFR(true) in all patients (0.78+/-0.12 versus 0.78+/-0.11 mm Hg; r=0.92; Delta%=4+/-0%). Without accounting for stenosis interaction, the value of FFR for each stenosis would have been significantly overestimated (0.85+/-0.08; P:<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary pressure measurements made by a pressure wire at maximum hyperemia provide a simple, practical method for assessing the individual hemodynamic significance of multiple stenoses within the same artery.
BACKGROUND: When several stenoses are present within 1 coronary artery, the hemodynamic significance of each stenosis is influenced by the presence of the other(s), and the calculation of coronary and fractional flow reserve (CFR and FFR) for each individual stenosis is confounded. Recently, we developed and experimentally validated a method to determine the true FFR of each stenosis as it would be after the removal of the other stenosis; the true FFR can be reliably predicted by coronary pressures measured before treatment at specific locations within the coronary artery using equations accounting for stenosis interaction. The aim of the present study was to test the validity of these equations in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study of 32 patients with 2 serial stenoses in 1 coronary artery, relevant pressures were measured before the intervention, after the treatment of 1 stenosis, and after the treatment of both stenoses. The true FFR of each stenosis (FFR(true)) was directly measured after the elimination of the other stenosis and compared with the value predicted (FFR(pred)) from the initial pressure measurements before treatment. Although the hyperemic gradient across 1 stenosis increased significantly (from 10+/-7 to 19+/-11 mm Hg after treatment of the other stenosis), FFR(pred) was close to FFR(true) in all patients (0.78+/-0.12 versus 0.78+/-0.11 mm Hg; r=0.92; Delta%=4+/-0%). Without accounting for stenosis interaction, the value of FFR for each stenosis would have been significantly overestimated (0.85+/-0.08; P:<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary pressure measurements made by a pressure wire at maximum hyperemia provide a simple, practical method for assessing the individual hemodynamic significance of multiple stenoses within the same artery.
Authors: Tomasz Pawlowski; Francesco Prati; Tomasz Kulawik; Eleonora Ficarra; Jacek Bil; Robert Gil Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Juan Luis Gutiérrez-Chico; Carlos Cortés; Miłosz Jaguszewski; Michele Schincariol; Ignacio J Amat-Santos; Juan A Franco-Peláez; Grzegorz Żuk; Dariusz Ciećwierz; Wojciech Wojakowski; Felipe Navarro; Shengxian Tu; Borja Ibáñez Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 2.737